Data 72 com

At least 72 cloud data servers operated by Chinese tech and ecommerce giant Alibaba in India are sending Indian users data to China, according to a News18 report citing top intelligence sources ... *On August 14th, the State of Illinois will migrate from Socrata to CKAN, a new Open Data Portal (ODP) platform. During the transition, the Rockford Police Department announced that it... Source: Rockford Police Department 72 Hour Dispatch Call Log Get historical data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) on Yahoo Finance. View and download daily, weekly or monthly data to help your investment decisions. Chinese Tech Giant Alibaba's Servers Found To Be Involved In Data Theft, At-least 72 Servers Sending Data To China by Swarajya Staff - Sep 15, 2020 11:16 AM Jack Ma, former executive Chairman of ... Open Data: Treasury Could Better Align USAspending.gov with Key Practices and Search Requirements GAO-19-72: Published: Dec 13, 2018. Publicly Released: Dec 13, 2018. DAT 72 SATA/USB Tape Driver Version 1.15.0 Microsoft signed DAT 72 SATA/USB Tape Driver for Windows 2003 Srvr 32 & 64-bit, Vista 32 & 64-bit, 2008 Srvr 32 & 64-bit computers. Download The '72-Year Rule' View larger image Records from the 1940 census are still protected by the '72-Year Rule.' The National Archives released them on April 2, 2012. The U.S. government will not release personally identifiable information about an individual to any other individual or agency until 72 years after it was collected for the decennial ... The NLS-72 describes the transition of young adults from high school through postsecondary education and the workplace. The data span 1972 through 1986 and include postsecondary transcripts. In new NH jobless data, 72% of new claims are in three industries Hospitality, retail and healthcare slammed by Covid-19 shutdown. April 27, 2020. Bob Sanders, The hospitality, retail and healthcare industries have been hit hardest by the coronavirus in New Hampshire, according to unemployment figures released last week. Metacritic.com scores and aggregates critics’ reviews of movies, music, and video games. The website provides a summary assessment of the critics’ evaluations, using a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher numbers mean that critics were more favorable. In theory, this website is pretty awesome, seemingly leveraging the wisdom-of-crowds to give consumers the most reliable...

Charm City

2008.06.11 14:35 Charm City

Subreddit for Baltimore, Maryland.
[link]


2017.12.15 08:33 satoshinm STM32F103C8T6 "Blue Pill" low-cost ARM development board (and other STM32F103 boards)

Discussion of everything related to STM32F103, a 72 MHz Cortex-M3 microcontroller from STMicroelectronics
[link]


2009.03.12 00:04 YusufReis Microsoft Excel Help & Support with your Formula, Macro, and VBA problems A Reddit Community

Discuss and answer questions about Microsoft Office Excel and spreadsheets in general
[link]


2020.10.01 00:38 lynlyn9 Help! I can't use my phone, Google play services keeps stopping

My phone is a Redmi Note 8 Pro, MIUI Global 12.0.3 Stable. Please help me, I don't know what to do. Here is the error:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Build fingerprint: 'Redmi/begonia/begonia:10/QP1A.190711.020/V12.0.3.0.QGGMIXM:userelease-keys' Revision: '0' ABI: 'arm64' Timestamp: 2020-10-01 06:35:58+0800 pid: 26773, tid: 26773, name: .gms.persistent >>> com.google.android.gms.persistent <<< uid: 10013 signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0xdbbe x0 000000000000dbba x1 0000007e199757d8 x2 0000000000000001 x3 0000007e1b16b748 x4 0000000000000001 x5 0000000000000000 x6 000000000fd8f436 x7 000000000000002d x8 000000000000dbc2 x9 e29f8ffda4725317 x10 0000000000000004 x11 0000007e1b16bed8 x12 00000000058aa920 x13 0000000000000004 x14 0000000000000000 x15 0000007e198fb0b0 x16 0000007d941f6f28 x17 0000007e15745620 x18 0000007e1aa20000 x19 0000007fd8f4da08 x20 0000007e199757d8 x21 0000007e19dd0b80 x22 0000007e19ed9020 x23 000000000000dbc2 x24 0000007e19d74600 x25 0000007d941fc240 x26 000000000000000b x27 0000000000000000 x28 0000007e19ed9020 x29 0000007e1b16bbf0 sp 0000007e1b16bb80 lr 0000007d943f5a74 pc 0000007d9434cc88 backtrace: #00 pc 0000000000146c88 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::ArtMethod::GetOatQuickMethodHeader(unsigned long)+216) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #01 pc 00000000001efa70 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::FaultManager::IsInGeneratedCode(siginfo, void, bool)+896) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #02 pc 00000000001ef3c4 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::FaultManager::HandleFault(int, siginfo, void)+92) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #03 pc 0000000000004ddc /system/bin/app_process64 (art::SignalChain::Handler(int, siginfo, void)+588) (BuildId: cb7f929d41b69c3e6cc6f84951542abf) #04 pc 0000000000000638 [vdso] (__kernel_rt_sigreturn) #05 pc 00000000000207d0 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libdexfile.so (art::DexFile::FindTryItem(art::dex::TryItem const, unsigned int, unsigned int)+32) (BuildId: 8a5b76a5f4f683d3dcba6ceae05a2bb4) #06 pc 0000000000022bf8 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libdexfile.so (art::CatchHandlerIterator::CatchHandlerIterator(art::CodeItemDataAccessor const&, unsigned int)+136) (BuildId: 8a5b76a5f4f683d3dcba6ceae05a2bb4) #07 pc 0000000000145b30 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::ArtMethod::FindCatchBlock(art::Handle, unsigned int, bool)+336) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #08 pc 00000000002e4878 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::interpreter::MoveToExceptionHandler(art::Thread, art::ShadowFrame&, art::instrumentation::Instrumentation const)+248) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #09 pc 00000000005a9eec /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (MterpHandleException+20) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #10 pc 00000000001362a8 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (MterpHelpers+72) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #11 pc 0000000000438fe8 /data/app/com.google.android.gms-Jqf5e6-akEiEJ3XOjujqPw==/base.apk (com.google.android.gms.plus.service.PlusChimeraService.+161340) #12 pc 00000000002b56e0 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (_ZN3art11interpreterL7ExecuteEPNS_6ThreadERKNS_20CodeItemDataAccessorERNS_11ShadowFrameENS_6JValueEbb.llvm.10559088909888815217+240) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #13 pc 0000000000593678 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (artQuickToInterpreterBridge+1024) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #14 pc 0000000000140468 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art_quick_to_interpreter_bridge+88) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #15 pc 00000000001375b8 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art_quick_invoke_static_stub+568) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #16 pc 00000000001460cc /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::ArtMethod::Invoke(art::Thread, unsigned int, unsigned int, art::JValue, char const)+276) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #17 pc 0000000000171fe4 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::ClassLinker::InitializeClass(art::Thread, art::Handle, bool, bool)+2188) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #18 pc 000000000015cc04 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art::ClassLinker::EnsureInitialized(art::Thread, art::Handle, bool, bool)+92) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #19 pc 0000000000596f70 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (artQuickResolutionTrampoline+3104) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #20 pc 00000000001401e8 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/libart.so (art_quick_resolution_trampoline+88) (BuildId: 8a3b7dc00ff3cc4e0a8dbb5e3417e2ec) #21 pc 00000000006b1214 /data/app/com.google.android.gms-Jqf5e6-akEiEJ3XOjujqPw==/oat/arm64/base
submitted by lynlyn9 to miui [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 22:17 Nibelheim Bronze 3600 CTR Data

I logged some data from my "Bronze" 3600. Hopefully others can use this.
PC failed at anything under 1.0 volts. 1.35 Volts is my reference score with PBO off. I didn't care about the temps but I did record some of the results.
voltage ccx0 ccx1 cinebench multi cinebench ppt Cinebench Temp multi per ppt
1.000 3575 3600 3223 51.5 - 62.58
1.025 3675 3675 3297 52.8 60.9 62.44
1.050 3700 3700 3351 53.7 62.0 62.40
1.075 3750 3775 3392 58.6 63.6 57.88
1.100 3800 3800 3430 60.5 64.3 56.69
1.125 3850 3850 3470 63.6 - 54.56
1.150 3900 3925 3534 68.1 - 51.89
1.175 3975 4000 3590 68.6 - 52.33
1.200 4000 4025 3629 69.9 - 51.92
1.225 4025 4075 3663 72.3 - 50.66
1.250 4125 4125 3713 78 74.9 47.60
1.350 3916 3916 3509 88 73.3 39.88
Cinebench Score graph
Cinebench PPT Graph
If I'm understanding this right 1.050 would be the sweet spot for heavily undervolting my chip. Else, 1.200 or 1.225 volts looks like a decent undervolt with overclock.
submitted by Nibelheim to Amd [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 22:09 smallstreetgains /r/wallstreetbets - Top Trending Data on 2020-09-30

Top trending tickers, sentiments, and options on /wallstreetbets for the day of September 30, 2020.

────────────────

Trending Tickers:

Ticker Company Mentions Bulls / Bears Price Change P/E
SPY Exchange Traded Fund 583 53.58% / 46.42% $335.38 0.91% -
NKLA Nikola Corporation 554 55.06% / 44.94% $20.57 15.04% -
PLTR - 527 84.39% / 15.61% - - -
NIO NIO Limited 429 80.59% / 19.41% $21.25 1.92% -
TSLA Tesla, Inc. 422 83.24% / 16.76% $429.10 2.39% 1077.30
AAPL Apple Inc. 242 85.58% / 14.42% $116.30 1.94% 34.69
MU Micron Technology, In 225 70.97% / 29.03% $47.01 -7.29% 25.35
AMD Advanced Micro Device 149 81.97% / 18.03% $82.29 0.64% 162.56
PTON Peloton Interactive, 148 37.65% / 62.35% $99.47 -1.00% -
VXX Exchange Traded Fund 140 82.35% / 17.65% $24.81 -0.52% -
ZM Zoom Video Communicat 135 60.53% / 39.47% $470.93 1.17% 594.51
BA The Boeing Company 135 84.91% / 15.09% $165.48 1.15% -
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc. 121 92.45% / 7.55% $19.95 -0.60% 8.29
SPCE Virgin Galactic Holdi 117 80.70% / 19.30% $19.21 -6.02% -
GM General Motors Company 110 80.00% / 20.00% $29.63 3.10% 27.37
DKNG DraftKings Inc. 89 46.67% / 53.33% $58.98 5.81% 1013.45
SLV Exchange Traded Fund 79 100.00% / 0.00% $21.68 -3.64% -
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation 77 65.00% / 35.00% $542.75 2.59% 97.00
DDOG Datadog, Inc. 76 81.25% / 18.75% $102.73 12.99% 9092.00
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. 75 77.78% / 22.22% $3161.81 0.54% 120.88
BABA Alibaba Group Holding 74 91.30% / 8.70% $294.17 6.23% 28.82
V Visa Inc. 72 77.78% / 22.22% $200.52 0.54% 37.92
FB Facebook, Inc. 71 89.66% / 10.34% $262.66 0.33% 33.40
DIS The Walt Disney Compa 70 86.11% / 13.89% $124.58 -0.65% -
QQQ Exchange Traded Fund 69 60.00% / 40.00% $278.99 1.10% -
SSSS SuRo Capital Corp. 69 90.00% / 10.00% $10.74 -19.00% 308.37
GO Grocery Outlet Holdin 67 97.23% / 2.77% $39.35 0.28% 58.39
GME GameStop Corp. 67 78.79% / 21.21% $10.23 -1.16% -
UPS United Parcel Service 61 94.12% / 5.88% $167.31 -0.71% 33.48
ARE Alexandria Real Estat 58 - / - $159.59 -0.21% 48.92
UVXY Exchange Traded Fund 54 90.00% / 10.00% $19.85 -0.90% -
SHOP Shopify Inc. 54 47.06% / 52.94% $1024.06 -0.16% -
M Macy's, Inc. 51 - / - $5.71 0.71% -
MSFT Microsoft Corporation 50 76.92% / 23.08% $210.98 1.79% 35.96
────────────────

Trending Options:

Ticker Strike Type Expiration
TSLA $420 Call 10/2
NIO $20 Call 10/2
RKT $25 Call 10/16
SPY $334 Call 10/2
AAPL $115 Call 11/20
AMZN $3200 Call 10/2
ICLN $18 Call 11/20
HLX $4 Call 12/18
NIO $19 Call 10/2
NCLH $17 Call 10/2
SPY $358 Call 3/2021
MU $50 Put 10/16
FAMILY $0 Put 10/1
NKLA $21 Call 10/2
L $5 Put 10/2
────────────────

Trending Sentiment:

Sentiment Comments %
Bullish 2284 61.23%
Neutral 24190 -
Bearish 1446 38.77%
────────────────

Other Data:

Overall Market Sentiment: Bullish
Comments Searched: 27920
Newly Trending Tickers: PLTR, NVDA, DDOG, AMZN, BABA, V, QQQ, SSSS, GO, UPS, ARE, UVXY, SHOP, M, MSFT
────────────────
You can view all top trending tickers on /RedditTickers.
Notice an error or have questions? Reply to this post or message smallstreetgains.
Financial data provided by finviz.
submitted by smallstreetgains to RedditTickers [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 21:04 mr_tyler_durden Notes and Highlights of Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear’s Live Update September 30, 2020

Notes and Highlights of Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear’s Live Update September 30, 2020
Notes by mr_tyler_durden and Daily Update Team
Register for your Absentee Ballot here!
Watch here:
Headlines
Full Notes
(continued in stickied comment)
submitted by mr_tyler_durden to Coronavirus_KY [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 18:32 Papalew32 Week 5 Match-up Preview Thread: #9 UCF Knights vs. Tulsa Golden Hurricane

#9 UCF vs. Tulsa
When: Saturday, October, 3, 07:30 PM Eastern
Where: Bounce House - Orlando, FL
Watch: ESPN2
Odds: UCF by 21.5 pts.
Total Points: 72.0
All-Time Series : UCF vs. Tulsa
UCF and Tulsa have met 11 times since 12/03/2005.
These teams last met 327 days ago on 11/08/2019.
Series Wins: UCF 3-0-8 Tulsa
Longest streak of continuous meetings: 3 (2014-2016).
Tulsa has won the last 3 meetings (2015-2019) in this series.
Last 6 Meetings
Winner Date Location UCF Tulsa Notes
Tulsa 2019-11-08 Tulsa, OK 31 34
Tulsa 2016-11-19 Orlando, FL 20 35
Tulsa 2015-11-07 Tulsa, OK 30 45
UCF 2014-11-14 Orlando, FL 31 7
Tulsa 2012-12-01 Tulsa, OK 27 33 Conf USA Championship Game
Tulsa 2012-11-17 Tulsa, OK 21 23
Series Comparison Data via Winsipedia
Through Week 4
Week UCF 2-0(1-0) Result Tulsa 0-1(0-0) Result
1 BYE N/A BYE N/A
2 BYE N/A BYE N/A
3 Georgia Tech 1-2(1-1) W 49-21 Oklahoma State#15 2-0(1-0) L 7-16
4 ECU 0-1(0-1) W 51-28 BYE N/A
All rankings reflect the current /cfb poll
UCF Injury Report
Data Scraped: 2020-09-30 10:00:03
Player Position Status Reported Notes
Kendrick Wilson DL Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Wilson has announced that he will not participate in the 2020 season as he has decided to sit out due to COVID-19 related concerns.
Jordan Davis TE Out For Season – Knee Thu, Sep 3 Davis is expected to miss the entire 2020 season after undergoing surgery to repair an ACL injury.
Mason Cholewa DL Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Cholewa has made a personal decision and has decided to opt-out for the entire 2020 season.
Jermaine Mcmillian DB Ques Sat – Undisclosed Sat, Sep 26 McMillian departed the previous game with an undefined injury, and it is up in the air if he will be available against Tulsa on Saturday.
Parker Boudreaux OL Ques Sat – Concussion Sat, Sep 26 Boudreaux has missed the last two games as he is going through the concussion protocol. It is unknown if he will be cleared in time for Saturday’s contest versus Tulsa.
Trillion Coles RB Out For Season – Achilles Fri, Sep 18 Coles will miss the entire 2020 due to an Achilles injury.
Elijah Benoit DB Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Benoit has informed the program that he will be sitting out the entire season due to COVID-19 related matters.
Tre Nixon WR Ques Sat – Collarbone Sat, Sep 26 Nixon sat out the previous game with a collarbone injury, and it has yet to be established if he will line up versus Tulsa on Saturday.
Adrian Medley OL Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Medley will sit out the duration of the 2020 season after informing the team of his personal decision.
Lamarius Benson OL Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Benson has ruled himself out of the entire 2020 campaign after letting the program aware of his reasons.
Allan Adams OL Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Adams has made a personal decision to opt-out for the entire 2020 season.
Kalia Davis DL Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Davis has announced that he will not be a participant in the 2020 season due to a personal decision.
Tay Gowan DB Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Gowan has informed the program that he will sit out the entire 2020 campaign due to a personal decision.
Darriel Mack Jr. QB Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Mack Jr. has decided to opt-out for the entire 2020 season due to a personal reason.
Devunte Dawson DB Out For Season – Personal Tue, Sep 1 Dawson will not take part in the 2020 season after informing the team of his personal decision.
Mckenzie Milton QB Out Indefinitely – Knee Wed, Aug 26 Milton is rehabbing a severe knee injury that cost him the entire 2019 season, and he is without a definitive timetable for return.
Injury data lifted from: boydsbets.com
Tulsa Injury Report
Data Scraped: 2020-09-30 10:00:03
Player Position Status Reported Notes
Zaven Collins LB Saturday – Conditioning Sat, Sep 26 Collins exited the last game with dehydration, and it is unclear if he will face UCF on Saturday.
Yohance Burnett LB Out For Season – Knee Sat, Sep 19 Burnett will sit out the entire 2020 campaign due to a torn ACL.
Cristian Williams S Out Indefinitely – Suspension Wed, Aug 26 Williams will miss an extended period while serving a suspension for an off-field incident.
Shamari Brooks RB Out For Season – Knee Sat, Sep 19 Brooks suffered a torn left ACL and will miss the remainder of the 2020 season.
Injury data lifted from: boydsbets.com
What are your "Keys to the Game"?
Who do you think wins?
Do you think the favorite will cover the spread?
Which player(s) are you most interested to watch?
Let's talk football!
To vote in the matchup "who will win poll" simply include the name of the team you think will win enclosed by {} as part of your TOP LEVEL comment discussing the matchup. To change your vote just edit your initial comment to bracket the other team. You can change your vote as often as you like until the GAME THREAD is posted
A full listing of accepted FBS team aliases can be found here.. For FCS teams you will need to use the full name as it appears in the post title.
A listing of links, and live vote totals, to all Match-up Preview threads for the current week can be found HERE.
Like this format? Generate your own "Match-up Discussion Thread" with the Match-up Discussion Thread Generator. Please DM dupreesdiamond with any issues/suggestions regarding this template
submitted by Papalew32 to CFB [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 16:55 BenCoops Champ Select Stats After Worlds 2020 Play-In Stage

Previous Champ Select Recaps:
Here are the combined champ select numbers after the Worlds 2020 Play-In Stage! Thanks for reading, as always!
 
Overall Takeaways
 
Presence and Win Rates Sorted in the following order: Presence, Win Rate, Picks
Champ Picks Bans Presence Win Rate
Nidalee 11 23 89% 64%
Orianna 11 22 87% 91%
Ornn 11 22 87% 91%
Lillia 16 17 87% 31%
Graves 17 12 76% 71%
Renekton 11 16 71% 45%
Sett 15 11 68% 40%
Leona 18 7 66% 50%
Camille 13 11 63% 54%
Lucian 5 18 61% 60%
Nautilus 11 11 58% 36%
Shen 6 15 55% 67%
Senna 15 6 55% 47%
Rakan 13 6 50% 62%
Alistar 11 7 47% 82%
Ezreal 13 5 47% 62%
Twitch 8 10 47% 50%
Ashe 10 8 47% 20%
Bard 5 12 45% 40%
Twisted Fate 7 9 42% 57%
Syndra 9 7 42% 56%
Caitlyn 4 11 39% 50%
Jhin 12 2 37% 67%
Hecarim 6 8 37% 50%
Azir 4 10 37% 50%
Galio 9 5 37% 22%
Akali 1 11 32% 0%
Zoe 7 5 32% 29%
Wukong 10 1 29% 40%
Volibear 6 5 29% 33%
Mordekaiser 4 6 26% 25%
Kalista 1 9 26% 0%
Thresh 2 7 24% 0%
Evelynn 3 5 21% 67%
Kindred 6 1 18% 83%
Sion 5 2 18% 20%
Sylas 5 2 18% 20%
Kassadin 3 3 16% 100%
Pantheon 1 5 16% 100%
Braum 5 1 16% 40%
Lee Sin 4 2 16% 25%
Malphite 2 3 13% 50%
Miss Fortune 3 1 11% 67%
Tristana 4 0 11% 50%
Ziggs 3 1 11% 33%
Jax 1 2 8% 100%
Cassiopeia 2 1 8% 50%
Ekko 2 1 8% 50%
Elise 2 1 8% 50%
Lulu 2 1 8% 50%
Karthus 1 2 8% 0%
Morgana 1 1 5% 100%
Swain 1 1 5% 100%
Gangplank 2 0 5% 50%
Vayne 2 0 5% 50%
Taric 2 0 5% 0%
Tahm Kench 1 1 5% 0%
Gnar 1 0 3% 100%
Karma 1 0 3% 100%
Aatrox 1 0 3% 0%
Aphelios 1 0 3% 0%
Corki 1 0 3% 0%
Draven 1 0 3% 0%
Gragas 1 0 3% 0%
Jarvan 1 0 3% 0%
Kayle 1 0 3% 0%
Kog'Maw 1 0 3% 0%
Poppy 1 0 3% 0%
Skarner 1 0 3% 0%
Urgot 1 0 3% 0%
Vladimir 1 0 3% 0%
Xayah 1 0 3% 0%
Blitzcrank 0 1 3% N/A
LeBlanc 0 1 3% N/A
Lux 0 1 3% N/A
Olaf 0 1 3% N/A
Quinn 0 1 3% N/A
Vel'Koz 0 1 3% N/A
 
Number of Picks by Role
TOP JG MID BOT SUP
Camille (13) Graves (17) Orianna (10) Ezreal (13) Leona (18)
Ornn (11) Lillia (16) Galio (9) Senna (13) Rakan (13)
Renekton (11) Nidalee (11) Syndra (9) Jhin (12) Nautilus (11)
Wukong (8) Hecarim (6) Sett (8) Ashe (10) Alistar (10)
Shen (6) Kindred (6) Twisted Fate (7) Twitch (8) Bard (5)
Sion (5) Lee Sin (4) Zoe (7) Caitlyn (4) Braum (5)
Volibear (5) Evelynn (3) Lucian (5) Miss Fortune (3) Sett (3)
Mordekaiser (4) Sett (3) Azir (4) Tristana (2) Senna (2)
Gangplank (2) Ekko (2) Kassadin (3) Wukong (2) Taric (2)
Malphite (2) Elise (2) Sylas (3) Ziggs (2) Thresh (2)
Aatrox Gragas Cassiopeia (2) Aphelios Karma
Gnar Jarvan Lulu (2) Draven Morgana
Jax Karthus Tristana (2) Kalista Pantheon
Kayle Skarner Akali Orianna Tahm Kench
Poppy Sylas Corki Swain
Sett Volibear Kog'Maw Vayne
Sylas Vayne Xayah
Urgot Ziggs
Vladimir
 
Unique Pick Rate by Team Note: This accounts for role diversity — e.g., since UOL played Orianna bot and mid, it counts as a unique pick for both
Team Unique Pick Rate
INTZ 84% (21/25)
Rainbow7 74% (26/35)
Legacy 70% (28/40)
Team Liquid 68% (17/25)
V3 68% (17/25)
UOL 65% (26/40)
PSG Talon 64% (16/25)
MAD Lions 60% (30/50)
LGD 51% (28/55)
Papara SuperMassive 43% (26/60)
 
I know these stats are readily available on multiple sites, as people have told me, but this was all done by hand — I enjoy working with data and doing data entry! As such, please let me know if there any errors. Thank you!
submitted by BenCoops to leagueoflegends [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 16:04 CovidMdBot 9/30/2020 In the last 24 hours there have been 414 new confirmed COVID-19 cases in Maryland. There has now been a total of 124,725 confirmed cases.

SUMMARY (9/30/2020)
YESTERDAY'S TESTING STATISTICS IN MARYLAND
Metric 24 HR Total Prev 7 Day Avg Today vs 7 Day Avg
Number of Tests 17,223 24,076 -28.5%
Number of Positive Tests 562 605 -7.1%
Percent Positive Tests 3.26% 2.59% +25.8%
State Reported 7-day Rolling Positive Testing Percent: 3%
Testing metrics are distinct from case metrics as an individual may be tested multiple times.
SUMMARY STATISTICS IN MARYLAND
Metric 24 HR Total Prev 7 Day Avg Today vs 7 Day Avg Total to Date
Number of confirmed cases 414 486 -14.7% 124,725
Number of confirmed deaths 3 8 -61.1% 3,805
Number of probable deaths 0 0 -100.0% 144
Number of persons tested negative 7,283 8,985 -18.9% 1,493,282
Ever hospitalized 70 32 +119.7% 15,530
Released from isolation 27 16 +64.3% 7,536
Total testing volume 17,223 23,803 -27.6% 2,605,913
CURRENT HOSPITALIZATION USAGE
Metric Total 24 HR Delta Prev 7 Day Avg Delta Delta vs 7 Day Avg
Currently hospitalized 334 -10 +5 -300.0%
Acute care 257 -8 +5 -269.7%
Intensive care 77 -2 0 -800.0%
The Currently hospitalized metric appears to be the sum of the Acute care and Intensive care metrics.
Cases and Deaths Data Breakdown
CASES BY COUNTY
County Total Cases Change Confirmed Deaths Change Probable Deaths Change
Allegany 474 1 23 0 0 0
Anne Arundel 10,117 44 238 2 12 0
Baltimore County 17,994 55 609 2 23 0
Baltimore City 15,629 23 469 1 17 0
Calvert 972 11 27 0 1 0
Caroline 657 3 7 0 0 0
Carroll 1,965 8 123 0 3 0
Cecil 1,085 6 34 0 1 0
Charles 2,798 19 99 0 2 0
Dorchester 594 0 10 0 0 0
Frederick 4,088 15 125 0 8 0
Garrett 74 0 1 0 0 0
Harford 3,060 15 72 0 4 0
Howard 5,120 22 116 0 6 0
Kent 305 2 22 0 2 0
Montgomery 22,584 72 809 1 40 0
Prince George's 29,494 78 805 0 23 0
Queen Anne's 666 0 25 0 1 0
Somerset 277 1 5 0 0 0
St. Mary's 1,310 4 57 0 0 0
Talbot 568 3 6 0 0 0
Washington 1,827 16 39 1 0 0
Wicomico 2,009 11 48 0 0 0
Worcester 1,058 5 26 0 1 0
Data not available 0 0 10 -4 0 0
CASES BY AGE & GENDER:
Demographic Total Cases Change Confirmed Deaths Change Probable Deaths Change
0-9 4,656 21 0 0 0 0
10-19 10,521 38 2 0 0 0
20-29 23,564 93 23 0 1 0
30-39 22,550 66 48 0 6 0
40-49 19,913 48 123 1 3 0
50-59 18,223 70 312 0 15 0
60-69 12,175 38 627 0 13 0
70-79 7,262 31 946 0 28 0
80+ 5,861 9 1,722 2 78 0
Data not available 0 0 2 0 0 0
Female 65,893 231 1,861 3 75 0
Male 58,832 183 1,944 0 69 0
Sex Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0
CASES BY RACE:
Race Total Cases Change Confirmed Deaths Change Probable Deaths Change
African-American (NH) 39,508 126 1,558 3 54 0
White (NH) 31,329 157 1,610 3 72 0
Hispanic 26,961 59 441 1 12 0
Asian (NH) 2,361 7 143 0 6 0
Other (NH) 5,724 19 42 0 0 0
Data not available 18,842 46 11 -4 0 0
MAP OF CASES:
MAP (9/30/2020)
TOTAL MD CASES:
TOTAL MD CASES (9/30/2020)
CURRENT MD HOSP. & TOTAL DEATHS:
CURRENT MD HOSP. & TOTAL DEATHS (9/30/2020)
PREVIOUS THREADS:
SOURCE(S):
OBTAINING DATASETS:
I am a bot. I was created to reproduce the useful daily reports from u/Bautch.
Image uploads are hosted on Imgur and will expire if not viewed within the last six months.
submitted by CovidMdBot to maryland [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 16:01 intersecting_lines RBBC Trends

Weekly, I'll be posting these types of posts alongside my Redzone Trends post
Notes:

Cardinals

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
kenyan drake 68.0% (+3.0%) 8 (+3) 66.7% (-4.7%) 5 (+1) 31.2% (+0.4%)
chase edmonds 32.0% (-3.0%) 4 (+2) 33.3% (+4.7%) 11 (+2) 68.8% (-0.4%)

Falcons

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
todd gurley 51.0% (-13.0%) 14 (+4) 77.8% (+6.4%) 7 (+2) 31.8% (-3.9%)
brian hill 34.0% (+14.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 7 (+3) 31.8% (+3.2%)
keith smith 28.0% (+12.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 3 (+1) 13.6% (-0.7%)
ito smith 9.0% (-6.0%) 4 (-) 22.2% (-6.4%) 5 (+2) 22.7% (+1.3%)

Ravens

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
jk dobbins 43.0% (+12.0%) 2 (-) 20.0% (0%) 5 (+4) 55.6% (+30.6%)
mark ingram 32.0% (-10.0%) 7 (-) 70.0% (0%) 4 (+1) 44.4% (-30.6%)
gus edwards 23.0% (-8.0%) 1 (-) 10.0% (0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)

Bills

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
devin singletary 89.0% (+33.0%) 10 (+6) 45.5% (+18.8%) 15 (+5) 75.0% (+8.3%)
tj yeldon 10.0% (+10.0%) 1 (+1) 14.3% (+14.3%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)
zack moss DNP 10 66.7% 4 26.7%

Panthers

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
mike davis 76.0% (+43.0%) 8 (+7) 34.8% (+28.1%) 17 (+9) 63.0% (+18.6%)
alex armah 14.0% (-9.0%) 2 (-) 8.7% (-4.6%) 1 (-) 3.7% (-1.9%)
reggie bonnafon 4.0% (+4.0%) 1 (+1) 12.5% (+12.5%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)
christian mccaffrey DNP 12 80.0% 9 50.0%

Bengals

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
joe mixon 72.0% (+22.0%) 7 (+3) 58.3% (+1.2%) 9 (+3) 37.5% (+4.2%)
giovani bernard 25.0% (-21.0%) 5 (+2) 41.7% (-1.2%) 15 (+3) 62.5% (-4.2%)

Bears

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
david montgomery 56.0% (+2.0%) 4 (+3) 40.0% (+23.3%) 9 (+3) 40.9% (-5.3%)
tarik cohen 32.0% (0%) 5 (+1) 50.0% (-16.7%) 9 (+6) 40.9% (+17.8%)
cordarrelle patterson 13.0% (-9.0%) 1 (-) 10.0% (-6.7%) 3 (-) 13.6% (-9.5%)
ryan nall 9.0% (+4.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 1 (-) 4.5% (-3.2%)

Browns

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
nick chubb 54.0% (-8.0%) 11 (+4) 45.8% (-12.5%) 3 (+1) 18.8% (+0.6%)
kareem hunt 46.0% (+12.0%) 13 (+8) 54.2% (+12.5%) 11 (+3) 68.8% (-3.9%)
andy janovich 27.0% (-11.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 2 (+1) 12.5% (+3.4%)

Cowboys

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
ezekiel elliott 98.0% (+5.0%) 17 (+3) 94.4% (+1.1%) 23 (+12) 82.1% (+8.8%)
tony pollard 7.0% (-3.0%) 1 (-) 5.6% (-1.1%) 5 (+1) 17.9% (-8.8%)

Broncos

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
melvin gordon 62.0% (-17.0%) 7 (-) 58.3% (-5.3%) 12 (+6) 75.0% (0%)
royce freeman 38.0% (+17.0%) 3 (+1) 25.0% (+6.8%) 3 (+2) 18.8% (+6.3%)
phillip lindsay DNP 2 25.0% 1 20.0%

Lions

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
adrian peterson 60.0% (+35.0%) 9 (+5) 52.9% (+12.9%) 4 (+1) 21.1% (+1.1%)
dandre swift 9.0% (-25.0%) 3 (-) 17.6% (-12.4%) 12 (+2) 63.2% (-3.5%)
kerryon johnson 30.0% (-2.0%) 5 (+2) 29.4% (-0.6%) 2 (+1) 10.5% (+3.8%)

Packers

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
aaron jones 71.0% (+23.0%) 19 (+7) 73.1% (-1.9%) 18 (+4) 66.7% (-3.3%)
jamaal williams 31.0% (-11.0%) 5 (+2) 19.2% (+0.4%) 5 (+1) 18.5% (-1.5%)
tyler ervin 37.0% (-1.0%) 2 (+1) 7.7% (+1.5%) 4 (+2) 14.8% (+4.8%)
aj dillon 10.0% (0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)

Texans

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
david johnson 96.0% (+1.0%) 3 (+1) 75.0% (-25.0%) 11 (+3) 84.6% (-4.3%)
cj prosise 4.0% (-1.0%) 1 (+1) 33.3% (+33.3%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)
cullen gillaspia 2.0% (+2.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 1 (+1) 25.0% (+25.0%)

Jaguars

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
james robinson 45.0% (-6.0%) 6 (+2) 66.7% (0%) 11 (+6) 44.0% (+5.5%)
chris thompson 45.0% (+4.0%) 3 (+1) 33.3% (0%) 12 (+6) 48.0% (+1.8%)
bruce miller 3.0% (-16.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 2 (-) 8.0% (-7.4%)

Colts

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
jonathan taylor 40.0% (-27.0%) 15 (+5) 60.0% (+1.2%) 9 (+1) 33.3% (-6.7%)
nyheim hines 33.0% (+21.0%) 9 (+3) 36.0% (+0.7%) 14 (+5) 51.9% (+6.9%)
jordan wilkins 28.0% (+5.0%) 1 (-) 4.0% (-1.9%) 1 (+1) 3.7% (+3.7%)

Chiefs

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
clyde edwards-helaire 69.0% (+7.0%) 14 (+3) 93.3% (-6.7%) 16 (+6) 64.0% (-7.4%)
darrel williams 21.0% (+8.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 5 (+2) 20.0% (-1.4%)
anthony sherman 13.0% (+4.0%) 1 (+1) 6.7% (+6.7%) 1 (+1) 4.0% (+4.0%)
darwin thompson 8.0% (-11.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 3 (+2) 14.3% (+4.3%)

Chargers

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
austin ekeler 72.0% (+15.0%) 7 (+2) 41.2% (+2.7%) 16 (+11) 76.2% (+13.7%)
joshua kelley 29.0% (-23.0%) 10 (+2) 58.8% (-2.7%) 5 (+2) 23.8% (-13.7%)

Rams

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
malcolm brown 49.0% (-5.0%) 8 (+1) 38.1% (-11.9%) 6 (+2) 46.2% (-3.8%)
darrell henderson 49.0% (+7.0%) 11 (+6) 52.4% (+16.7%) 6 (+3) 46.2% (+8.7%)
cam akers DNP 2 14.3% 1 12.5%

Dolphins

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
myles gaskin 75.0% (+10.0%) 11 (+9) 50.0% (+30.0%) 16 (+5) 76.2% (+7.4%)
matt breida 18.0% (-3.0%) 3 (-) 13.6% (-16.4%) 2 (-) 9.5% (-3.0%)
jordan howard 7.0% (-4.0%) 8 (+3) 36.4% (-13.6%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)
patrick laird 2.0% (-2.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 2 (-) 9.5% (-3.0%)

Vikings

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
dalvin cook 74.0% (-6.0%) 5 (-) 50.0% (-12.5%) 9 (+5) 52.9% (+12.9%)
alexander mattison 25.0% (+6.0%) 4 (+2) 40.0% (+15.0%) 6 (-) 35.3% (-24.7%)

Saints

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
alvin kamara 67.0% (-1.0%) 16 (+3) 64.0% (-1.0%) 31 (+14) 81.6% (+7.7%)
latavius murray 34.0% (+7.0%) 8 (+2) 32.0% (+2.0%) 4 (+1) 10.5% (-2.5%)
ty montgomery DNP 1 5.0% 3 13.0%

Patriots

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
rex burkhead 46.0% (-25.0%) 9 (+7) 45.0% (+20.0%) 16 (+10) 61.5% (+11.5%)
sony michel 38.0% (+17.0%) 5 (+1) 25.0% (-25.0%) 3 (+2) 11.5% (+3.2%)
jakob johnson 26.0% (+2.0%) 1 (-) 5.0% (-7.5%) 2 (+1) 7.7% (-0.6%)
james white DNP 1 25.0% 3 75.0%

Jets

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
frank gore 41.0% (-16.0%) 6 (+3) 75.0% (+15.0%) 3 (+1) 18.8% (-6.2%)
lamical perine 33.0% (+19.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 2 (+2) 16.7% (+16.7%)
kalen ballage 30.0% (+18.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 7 (+5) 58.3% (+8.3%)
josh adams DNP 2 40.0% 2 25.0%

Giants

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
dion lewis 38.0% (-50.0%) 2 (-) 28.6% (0%) 9 (+3) 40.9% (+3.4%)
wayne gallman 35.0% (+35.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 4 (+3) 23.5% (+14.4%)
devonta freeman 29.0% (+29.0%) 0 (-) 0% (0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)
saquon barkley DNP 5 71.4% 9 56.2%

Raiders

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
josh jacobs 59.0% (-7.0%) 14 (+3) 60.9% (-7.9%) 13 (+4) 54.2% (-2.0%)
jalen richard 34.0% (+13.0%) 3 (+2) 13.0% (+6.8%) 4 (+3) 16.7% (+10.5%)
alec ingold 15.0% (-5.0%) 1 (-) 4.3% (-1.9%) 3 (+1) 12.5% (0%)
devontae booker 7.0% (-7.0%) 5 (+2) 21.7% (+2.9%) 4 (-) 16.7% (-8.3%)

Steelers

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
james conner 66.0% (-11.0%) 11 (+5) 73.3% (-1.7%) 11 (+5) 61.1% (+6.6%)
benny snell 19.0% (+4.0%) 2 (+1) 13.3% (+0.8%) 2 (-) 11.1% (-7.1%)
jaylen samuels 8.0% (0%) 2 (+1) 13.3% (+0.8%) 3 (-) 16.7% (-10.6%)
anthony mcfarland 13.0% (+13.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 2 (+2) 28.6% (+28.6%)

Eagles

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
miles sanders 78.0% (+1.0%) 7 (+3) 87.5% (+7.5%) 15 (+8) 78.9% (+8.9%)
boston scott 14.0% (-4.0%) 1 (-) 12.5% (-7.5%) 6 (+1) 26.1% (-9.6%)
corey clement 7.0% (+3.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 2 (-) 8.7% (-5.6%)

Seahawks

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
chris carson 58.0% (-5.0%) 8 (+2) 80.0% (+5.0%) 12 (+3) 66.7% (-2.5%)
carlos hyde 21.0% (-3.0%) 1 (-) 10.0% (-2.5%) 3 (+1) 16.7% (+1.3%)
travis homer 21.0% (+8.0%) 1 (-) 10.0% (-2.5%) 3 (+1) 16.7% (+1.3%)

49ers

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
kyle juszczyk 49.0% (+1.0%) 1 (-) 4.5% (-4.6%) 6 (+1) 19.4% (-3.3%)
jerick mckinnon 62.0% (+41.0%) 10 (+4) 45.5% (-9.0%) 10 (+4) 32.3% (+5.0%)
jeff wilson 30.0% (+22.0%) 7 (+7) 43.8% (+43.8%) 3 (+3) 18.8% (+18.8%)
jamycal hasty 8.0% (+8.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 1 (+1) 11.1% (+11.1%)
raheem mostert DNP 2 18.2% 7 31.8%
tevin coleman DNP 2 18.2% 4 18.2%

Buccaneers

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
ronald jones 51.0% (+17.0%) 10 (+6) 50.0% (+16.7%) 9 (+4) 31.0% (+4.7%)
leonard fournette 37.0% (-6.0%) 7 (+2) 35.0% (-6.7%) 8 (+2) 27.6% (-4.0%)
lesean mccoy 16.0% (-2.0%) 3 (-) 15.0% (-10.0%) 12 (+4) 41.4% (-0.7%)

Titans

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
derrick henry 75.0% (+4.0%) 21 (+7) 91.3% (-2.0%) 8 (+3) 72.7% (+1.3%)
khari blasingame 25.0% (+6.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 1 (-) 9.1% (-5.2%)
jeremy mcnichols 12.0% (-6.0%) 2 (+1) 8.7% (+2.0%) 2 (+1) 18.2% (+3.9%)
darrynton evans 11.0% (+11.0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)

Washington

Player Snap % RZ Looks RZ Looks Share TGTS RB Target Share
jd mckissic 52.0% (+8.0%) 5 (-) 25.0% (-2.8%) 9 (+4) 56.2% (+0.6%)
antonio gibson 40.0% (-25.0%) 5 (+2) 25.0% (+8.3%) 7 (+3) 43.8% (-0.6%)
peyton barber 11.0% (+9.0%) 10 (-) 50.0% (-5.6%) 0 (-) 0.0% (0%)
submitted by intersecting_lines to fantasyfootball [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 15:42 FeistyTortoise For Toronto condo investors, the gravy train takes a detour

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-estate/article-for-toronto-condo-investors-the-gravy-train-takes-a-detou?utm_medium=Referrer:+Social+Network+/+Media&utm_campaign=Shared+Web+Article+Links
On the front lines of Toronto’s cooling condominium apartment market, agents are contending with selling and leasing conditions that are upside-down compared with just a few months ago.
Investor-owned condos seem particularly vulnerable to the shifts in the rental market, which has been softened by factors including the arrival of thousands of newly completed condos and a decline in immigration and student tenants. And now there are signs the tenant shortage has sent a price signal to the resale market, too.
We are getting two, three calls per day [from tenants] to renegotiate,” says Sundeep Bahl of UrbanCondo, a company that helps investor clients purchase presale condominiums and then manages the units for them once construction is complete. Mr. Bahl says he has 72 listings currently active on the Multiple Listing Service and has three associates working with him to handle the increased turnover. “There’s no new tenants; we’re just recycling them from one unit to another. Some are taking advantage of the situation, to be honest with you. They see the unit down the hallway that’s $300 cheaper and they say ‘I’m leaving.'"
Mr. Bahl says UrbanCondo has close to 600 units under management. Some owners have one or two condos in their portfolio, some have many more.
Sometimes his clients want to call the tenants' bluff and list the unit for sale or for lease and see which offer gets taken up first. But lately, what happens instead is the landlord ends up with neither a sale nor a tenant.
“There’s the risk of losing the tenant and the property not selling ... [and] I can’t find you another tenant. We used to have 10-12 units up for lease [at a given time], now it’s 80 units,” he says. “I’ll put a unit for sale in one building and [get] not a single showing on some of these properties.”
Scott Ingram, an accountant and realtor with Regal Realty Century 21, tracks historical sales data in Toronto. He says that in 2019, word got out quickly when a condo came up for sale and he’d field numerous calls. Now, it’s him doing the calling. “There’s a lot of calling agents pro-actively ... I didn’t use to have to. You really have to work to bring people to table,” he says.
In January, active listings Toronto sat at just more than 1,300 units, the lowest inventory in about a decade. Starting in June and July, listings soared well above the average, reaching almost 5,000 by August. In September, it’s now more than 6,000.
At the same time, buying activity has stayed relatively constant. Mr. Ingram says the number of units sold conditionally has averaged at about 382 a week for the past 14 weeks, which is higher than the 371-a-week average the Toronto market averaged between 2018 and 2019.
The sudden bountiful supply is also putting pressure on prices.
“Despite a partial rebound from the spring, sales are down 14 per cent year to date and have fallen to their lowest level since 2013,” says Shaun Hildebrand, president of real estate analysis firm Urbanation Inc. In August, Toronto resale condo prices were down 11 per cent from their March high.
Many downtown condo buildings have witnessed price declines compared with the pre-COVID-19 market amid surging listings. At the 1,343-unit Ice Condos across from the Scotiabank Arena – buildings well known to have a high rate of Airbnb use – there are currently 43 units available for sale and 126 up for lease. Where a one-bedroom, 500-square-foot apartment sold in January for $632,000, two units of similar size and amenities sold at $559,000 and $599,000 between July and September.
“It looks to me that prices are going to start showing annual declines by October or November given the current state of the market,” Mr. Hildebrand says. “But keep in mind the current average is nearly $750,000 and has grown by 67 per cent over the past five years.”
That history of price growth explains, in part, the whiplash some owners are feeling. “You have to remember the market was absolutely nuts right before the pandemic. In January/February, everything was going way over asking, 10 offers were common,” says Andrew La Fleur, an agent with Re/Max Condos Plus Corp. Brokerage who specializes in condos for investors. Mr. La Fleur said he’s seen the steepest price correction among units more than $800,000. “Prices were up in [February] in some cases $100,000 from October, 2019. So it’s been a dramatic turnaround to say the least.”
Mr. Bahl says he thinks it could take 18 months to two years for some of his clients' investments to recover, even if rents have fallen to essentially 2017 levels and rent controls make them difficult to escalate quickly. But it may also just be a small setback for a class of investors who have had a good run so far.
“People have been playing this game, they’ve seen unprecedented growth for the last 10-15 years. Until recently it was a no brainer: You were bound to make money,” Mr. Bahl says.
submitted by FeistyTortoise to TorontoRealEstate [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 14:57 JauneSiriusWhut Old & new spots throughout the USA

G550 4x4 (FL)
https://www.google.com/maps/@26.1431982,-81.7894673,3a,32.9y,129.4h,82.76t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sKAFJ7Yn-yqeyfE5fMU0JpQ!2e0!5s20190501T000000!7i13312!8i6656
R8 V10 Spyder 2013 (IL)
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0654483,-87.7547991,3a,15.4y,223.76h,86.81t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sHY7hmn0ABT1GxwD6R2Hiaw!2e0!5s20181001T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Never seen this Singer before! (FL)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@25.8882733,-80.1238935,3a,15.2y,253.3h,86.04t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s5Y3q1m42t_950tMwPFxLPw!2e0!5s20190101T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl
This is a cool one! A Superlite SL-C! (FL)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@25.8881487,-80.1238025,3a,15y,301.75h,85.55t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sMN7fDVB2ihyck0t7T_ocSw!2e0!5s20190101T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl
(2015) Nice 360 Modena (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1444981,-118.2548857,3a,18.2y,290.38h,83.95t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sgQQPEmLqm382q6MncpnaLw!2e0!5s20141001T000000!7i13312!8i6656
Red 991 Turbo S Mk2 (GA)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@33.8738811,-84.380986,3a,15.3y,17.26h,87.92t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sriNgoUQAsHh_a9byYbfitA!2e0!5s20191001T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en&hl=en
(2014) 996 GT2! (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5945652,-117.8686935,3a,16.9y,54.43h,87.31t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sEJ6RO0YQYvKdY_-MujAkpg!2e0!5s20141001T000000!7i13312!8i6656
(2018) Cool Avendador I haven't seen before! (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0684713,-118.4005258,3a,23.3y,242.72h,83.73t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sJcyJ-gkpYUzkTEgAgeTMfA!2e0!5s20180201T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Nice colored RR SVR 2018 (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7219743,-116.3631736,3a,25.9y,313.56h,82.09t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sESkucpFQ-hKwD0kfko6bdA!2e0!5s20190501T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Awesome baby blue RS5 Coupe! (TX)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@32.8623143,-96.8507248,3a,15y,188.77h,86.17t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s2c0BspKwOkKABZcr-IvPhA!2e0!5s20200101T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
(2018) Baby blue 991 GT3 Mk2 (TX)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@32.8665033,-96.8221304,3a,35y,335.74h,85.18t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0O_NM4NEV52NIk8bT1G4_w!2e0!5s20180601T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
(2012) Phantom Coupe in a small town in NY! (NY)
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.9996938,-72.2953831,3a,31.2y,287.64h,82.21t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLF3HY3LO_TZ-cb_3hGnCSQ!2e0!5s20120901T000000!7i13312!8i6656
(2018) GranTurismo, 488 Spider & 991 Turbo Cabrio Mk2 (NY)
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.0012585,-72.2983364,3a,49.7y,326.66h,84t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sNqgibholYT8ekvLJYXCtWg!2e0!5s20180701T000000!7i13312!8i6656
(2018) 991 Turbo S Mk1 (NY)
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.0028307,-72.2958559,3a,50.9y,224.88h,75.01t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sKBoNKlh03-nvyYoHk5VcEw!2e0!5s20180801T000000!7i13312!8i6656
(2018) Nice GTC Speed 2016 (NY)
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.0008998,-72.2906321,3a,36.1y,66.2h,81.91t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sNOXvGdUu3EFW7dGyyHjCrg!2e0!5s20180701T000000!7i13312!8i6656
Cullinan! (TX)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@32.8947742,-96.819955,3a,15y,149.98h,87.86t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sMOE_HbmCrbDb_yu4j_sHfg!2e0!5s20200101T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
Wraith (RI)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@41.8247953,-71.4156801,3a,19.2y,3.36h,86.56t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sprenOAbVfoQbLaKnmtCn2A!2e0!5s20190701T000000!7i16384!8i8192
(2014) Conti GT SuperSports (FL)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@26.3897161,-80.14663,3a,25.1y,304.23h,84.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sj66ODw-7mnChKocM5-XoWA!2e0!5s20140301T000000!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en
Nice Ghost (AZ)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@33.5553145,-111.8940387,3a,28.4y,21.09h,85.46t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sniyPs9bPjfEfWdp3s0-5Bw!2e0!5s20190201T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl&authuser=0
Cool AMG GT-C (CA)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@37.757231,-122.3883019,3a,46.3y,214.92h,77.71t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sL6OKTRbdOqpAw6g1Xod-aA!2e0!5s20180101T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
Maybach 57 (CA)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@36.5435903,-121.9049856,3a,15y,56.46h,88.56t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1szIff0Vjx7n0Mepw1E4RbbQ!2e0!5s20190801T000000!7i16384!8i8192
991 GT3 (AZ)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@33.6343626,-111.9076864,3a,17.2y,160.99h,87.52t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sdZNSmTm5AO_DNVZhc1wDOw!2e0!5s20190301T000000!7i16384!8i8192
SL65 AMG (FL)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@27.9393301,-82.5551133,3a,16.2y,102.97h,86.37t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBy6ehFYpPpuJGKS3WlMfvQ!2e0!5s20200201T000000!7i16384!8i8192
C63 AMG Cabriolet Ocean Edition (NY)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@40.5982903,-73.9099136,3a,41.5y,13.74h,81.46t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sARvZYdai1P0SoxV3xo3H1Q!2e0!5s20191001T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
Nice Dawn! (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0322304,-118.475751,3a,24.2y,104.04h,83.09t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJLlmvUNd9M7DxGiH3GvreQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
AMG GT 4 door (CA)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@38.4025717,-122.3608382,3a,15.2y,22.44h,85.53t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sV56KL_BREZ3wpDeqAXMgJA!2e0!5s20110501T000000!7i16384!8i8192
570S Spider (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@37.4286428,-122.1499643,3a,35y,86.57h,84.93t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1spIDU_n0Oe7Iet4SwFo5cWg!2e0!5s20200201T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Viper SRT-10 (MI)
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4889879,-83.144507,3a,16.2y,46.39h,85.36t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAkUvBtZtq_fPG8sFcq393w!2e0!5s20161001T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Rapide S (FL)
https://www.google.hu/maps/@28.5995837,-81.3515015,3a,29y,326.77h,83.63t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1swIfuIOz8pBxalbQ9UqMWpQ!2e0!5s20160401T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Yellow California T (rare it seems!) (AZ)
https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@33.7014189,-111.9246334,3a,15.9y,166.4h,85.38t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sKoPmyJAeaWVA4mpFcCBaDw!2e0!5s20180601T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en&hl=en
Evora (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@37.6125955,-122.4038075,3a,24.5y,224.06h,84.65t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-cmcnPNBxufl4aUZSlnTMA!2e0!5s20190801T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Urus (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@37.5995765,-122.3887076,3a,45.7y,265.31h,76.77t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sii5z-shCw0nJRtowTPsEvw!2e0!5s20190801T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Huracan Performante! (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@37.596942,-122.3862762,3a,19.7y,312.81h,84.61t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sPSBDeLbZfKMTply615qo3Q!2e0!5s20180301T000000!7i16384!8i8192
What's with this spoiler… (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@37.4960045,-122.2471784,3a,20.8y,186.75h,87.04t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sv7Nu0zzKbLvOwr0f18tWdQ!2e0!5s20200201T000000!7i16384!8i8192
AMG GT-S (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.7619366,-122.4059821,3a,42.3y,127.04h,80.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ska7daNf6X_7fY6MrgqcqYg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Very blue G63 AMG (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.5557719,-122.2986094,3a,15y,43.87h,88.38t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1szYi6MfD2V3Ga2IB6ZwDMag!2e0!5s20200301T000000!7i16384!8i8192
AMV12 Vantage (FL)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@26.5767816,-80.053457,3a,15y,105.14h,86.7t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1seHlYJlMrIpCuwjZmUWbQUA!2e0!5s20190401T000000!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl
Orange M3 F80 (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@37.3948779,-122.1001068,3a,28.9y,190.03h,85.86t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sZiZoTWFcX2WtI6tylXsTZQ!2e0!5s20190101T000000!7i16384!8i8192
AMG GT (RI)
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.829187,-71.4007725,3a,19.9y,252.31h,86.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd7AfQpSdAYOYpkti_CMesw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Huracan Performante Spyder! (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2246271,-121.9829782,3a,21.6y,58.5h,80.6t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s46xYXD7yl9OsQWWOhFWgGw!2e0!5s20200201T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Camaro ZL1 & M4 (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2271735,-121.9818121,3a,42.5y,103.97h,86.6t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1seJKjTwHJu3cdEgVrHSfkrA!2e0!5s20191101T000000!7i16384!8i8192
R8 V10 Spyder & RR SVR 2018 (IL)
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.1527997,-87.8384227,3a,75y,345.49h,86.49t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBOBaLiSiksg-_pV_6Ke2gQ!2e0!5s20190901T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Phantom (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2209148,-121.98493,3a,28.8y,231.95h,85.84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTG1CovDW-Gfhn2mSCe-Zpg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
GTC4Lusso (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2210626,-121.9752395,3a,40.5y,22.34h,79.93t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sU8EAse5EZmKoYhmzYw_WaA!2e0!5s20190301T000000!7i16384!8i8192
(2016) 996 GT3 Mk2 (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2230052,-121.9837088,3a,19.9y,204.69h,83.01t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sTl3TPFRFlZc8YqRKVkCgPw!2e0!5s20160701T000000!7i13312!8i6656
(2018) AMV12 Vantage (MN)
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.9732166,-93.4057402,3a,40.4y,143.76h,83.18t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s24jucUhQqQN3MhJGauymkQ!2e0!5s20181001T000000!7i13312!8i6656
Wraith (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2181767,-121.9695205,3a,70.6y,257.63h,80.96t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFEtoDuJPSS-St8AQFNrVfw!2e0!5s20140101T000000!7i16384!8i8192
996 GT2 & California T (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2349705,-121.9607825,3a,69.2y,324.46h,81.69t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sgyzjgjnoUZpjceTR1zFWFQ!2e0!5s20191101T000000!7i16384!8i8192
Ram SRT-10 Quad Cab (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.2348007,-121.9612238,3a,23.9y,230.68h,86.8t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sK0NRGECzfmZmBtOjL-aZRg!2e0!5s20190301T000000!7i16384!8i8192
991 GT3 Touring & E63 AMG (CA)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.240826,-121.9592123,3a,45.5y,159.09h,81.52t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0962F2ZCHJEdKOuoAz4Hhg!2e0!5s20190301T000000!7i16384!8i8192
(2015) 458 Spider (MI)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@38.6326489,-90.4058586,3a,33.2y,122.31h,84.44t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sDtaf-SFh86NcD1YRYbgZfA!2e0!5s20150501T000000!7i13312!8i6656
Awesome F12berlinetta (FL)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@27.8928587,-82.5270879,3a,22.6y,67.42h,87.57t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1swHud5cUSKOucClMctWCuNQ!2e0!5s20200101T000000!7i16384!8i8192
S650 Maybach Cabriolet! (FL)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@27.893075,-82.5267663,3a,15y,245.25h,88.26t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sDCD50fxa-SW25w0qC5Iq7g!2e0!5s20200101T000000!7i16384!8i8192
(2014) 997 GT3 RS Mk2 (FL)
https://www.google.com/maps/@26.3410785,-80.0906161,3a,21.1y,207.97h,86.44t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sSnG9op-a7UqPOh_29SuGPw!2e0!5s20140401T000000!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en
(DealeImport, but who cares!) Aston Martin V12 Zagato! (TX)
https://www.google.com/maps/@29.811708,-95.4840872,3a,15y,78.03h,87.91t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sp9ikAKRvoFam1hIJqUUuvQ!2e0!5s20161201T000000!7i13312!8i6656
(2018) AMG GT Facelift (MD)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@39.0134916,-77.0462283,3a,17.5y,55.54h,85.24t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sEykx2Akqb6xA_oxPQGDCzQ!2e0!5s20190801T000000!7i13312!8i6656?hl=nl
(2016) DBS Volante (CA)
https://www.google.nl/maps/@34.0838858,-118.3703323,3a,23.1y,54.5h,84.22t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sNko4gypyVrwJ7IwDq-Bc4w!2e0!5s20160201T000000!7i13312!8i6656?hl=nl
submitted by JauneSiriusWhut to StreetviewCarSpotting [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 14:44 NeedToGoNowNow Visiting SA from 1st Oct 2020 - question

Hi. I'm hoping to travel from europe to visit an elderly relative who has been on her own for all of lockdown save for some very kind friends who helped very generously. I do not possess a South African passport or other long term residence visa and my 4-5 trips a year previously were under the visa waiver program.
I find this situation most disagreeable and I find it rather unreasonable that I cannot plan a future visit as I and other family members did previous to this event to assist in ensuring her quality of life is OK. The mental health impact of this event especially on elderly persons is I believe very much underestimated. However, I digress.
I cannot find concrete information on the south African government websites, social media, traditional media or anywhere else as to how one is supposed to organise travel to SA.
This article from Sept 17th details the announcement that international travel from 1st Oct is allowed: https://m.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/748/208416.html
For international travel, government will place restrictions for travel to and from certain countries that have high infection rates. A list of countries will be published based on the latest scientific data.
However, two weeks later I see no such information published. Hopefully I have just missed it. I was directed to the website of my local South African diplomatic office, however this renders the default landing page of a virtual machine software: https://imgur.com/a/UKtFpjU
I have tried calling and they said they cannot help me at this time.
Does anyone know where I might be able to progress putting a plan in place? I have a flight in November to CPT booked in December 2019. I find strange of that such a large country has such confusing and incomprehensible protocols.
Thank you for your help
update: live - https://youtu.be/HxSSUofh5zY
High risk countries, no leisure visitors:
Edit: the genius forgot to read the whole list, so the above incomplete
Visas

- anyone can now apply for a passport

submitted by NeedToGoNowNow to southafrica [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 12:32 majinmattossj2 Brazilian Big12 series, Episode 11/12: Cruzeiro

Previous episodes: Flamengo, Vasco, Fluminense, Grêmio, Botafogo, Atlético Mineiro, Internacional, Corinthians, Santos, Palmeiras
In this series I will present each of the 12 Brazilian teams that together compose the "Big 12". My point is to make them more knowledgeable to you, since each one of these teams have their share of the Brazil national team success and of Brazilian club football accomplishments as a whole. I'll try to be as smooth, efficient and non-boring as I can. If the feedback is positive, I'll keep bringing more to this series. So ok, let's do this!
Method: I'll present the teams in a chronological order, from the oldest foundation (Flamengo-1895) to the latest one (São Paulo-1930). The order will be: Flamengo, Vasco, Fluminense, Grêmio, Botafogo, Atlético Mineiro, Internacional, Corinthians, Santos, Palmeiras, Cruzeiro, São Paulo. How many of these have you heard of?
Extra clubs: Due to a high number of requests, I'll also present 3 teams who don't belong to the Big12, but are also considered big clubs in Brazil: Bahia, Athletico Paranaense and Coritiba. Welcome to the club!
Geographical reference: Before we start, I'd like to ask something very simple from you. I want you to keep in mind that these 12 teams are spread in 4 different States in Brazil. The club's State name is written below, next to the club's name. It has a direct link to Google Maps, so that you can check it out to make this experience more accurate.

Episode 11/12: Cruzeiro (State: Minas Gerais), founded in 1921

State rivals: Atlético Mineiro, América Mineiro

Stadium: Mineirão - New / Old

Mascot: Fox

Major achievements: 2 Copa Libertadores (1976, 1997), 4 Brazilian Leagues (1966, 2003, 2013, 2014), 6 Copa do Brasil (1993, 1996, 2000, 2003, 2017, 2018), 2 Supercopa Libertadores (1991, 1992)

State League titles: 38 (Against Atlético Mineiro's 45, América Mineiro's 16)

PLAY AND LISTEN TO CRUZEIRO'S ANTHEM WHILE READING - Click here
Palestra Italia and the first decades
Inspired by the Italian team founded in São Paulo in 1914, Palestra Italia (eventually Palmeiras), the Belo Horizonte Italian city colony decided to create their own Palestra Italia in 1921. In 1925 already, the club was open to any nationality.
Until 1959, due to Brazil's huge size and weak infrastructure, there wasn't a national league yet, so the teams played inside their own State Leagues. Cruzeiro won their first in 1928, followed by two more titles in 1929 and 1930. At that point, their rivals Atlético Mineiro and América Mineiro had 3 and 10 titles, respectivally.
In 1931, two Cruzeiro's players became the firsts Brazilians bought by an European club: Ninão (FW) and Nininho (LB) left for Lazio in 1931.
1942: World War II, Palestra Italia becomes Cruzeiro
After Brazil's war declaration against the Axis, every Italian/German/Nippon-associated name in the country would have to be rebranded. Palestra Italia became Palestra Mineiro (Mineiro meaning "from the state of Minas Gerais"). However, despite Palestra being a greek word, it had to be taken out aswell. Yale, Ypiranga and Cruzeiro were suggested at the assembly, with the latter being chosen, in honor of the Cruzeiro do Sul constellation.
Through the 1940s, 1950s and until 1965, Cruzeiro won 8 more State League titles, totalizing 11 titles, Atlético Mineiro and América Mineiro had 22 and 12 titles, respectivally.
1965-1977: the dream team
In this period, Cruzeiro stepped up from being a regional team to become a major national protagonist, notably beating the big teams from the Rio-São Paulo axis.
Cruzeiro won 1 Copa Libertadores (1976), 1 Brazilian League (1966) and 10 State Leagues (5 of them consecutively). They also finished 2nd in 3 Brazilian Leagues (1969, 1974, 1975) and 1 Copa Libertadores (1977).
Cruzeiro also provided 7 World Cup call-ups, with Tostão (1966, 1970), Fontana (1970), Piazza (1970, 1974) and Nelinho (1974, 1978). Besides, from 1970 to 1975, 6 Cruzeiro players' were elected to one of the greatest League XI in the world at that time: Brito (1970), Dirceu Lopes (1970, 1971, 1973), Tostão (1970), Piazza (1972), Nelinho (1975) and Palhinha (1975). Tostão was elected 1971 South American Player of the Year.
Everything started in 1965: the team wasn't performing well in the State League, until the building of the new city stadium ended - the Mineirão inspired Cruzeiro to become a more competitive team, so that they ended the State League as undisputed champions.
In 1966, the team was reinforced with some talents, for the 8th edition of the Brazilian League, still disputed in a short knock-out system. Only each State League champion of all the Brazilian states (21) were allowed into it, as well as the current champions. Cruzeiro had never gone beyond a top6 position, but in 1966 everything would be different.
It was in that 1966 season that Cruzeiro beat Pelé's Santos 6-2 in the final, at a full Mineirão (90.000 spectators). It was absurd, and no one could believe that.
Cruzeiro (4-1-5) 6 x 2 Santos (4-2-4)
1. Raul 1. Gylmar
2. Pedro Paulo 2. Carlos Alberto Torres
3. William 3. Mauro
4. Procópio 4. Oberdan
5. Neco o.g. 5. Zé Carlos
6. Piazza 6. Zito
7. Dirceu Lopes 3x 7. Lima
8. Natal 1x 8. Dorval
9. Evaldo 2x 9. Toninho Guerreiro
10. Tostão 1x 10. Pelé
11. Hilton 11. Pepe
Airton Moreira Lula
Santos had 6 World Cup champions on their line-up, and had won 5 consecutive Brazilian League titles, besides being continental and club world champions twice, and having smashed every possible big team in the world. But now, it was Cruzeiro who smashed them 6-2, with a hat-trick from Dirceu Lopes.
The first half ended 5-0 in Cruzeiro's favor, with a constant bombing from them. Santos scored twice in the second half, before Cruzeiro ended the match with their 6th goal: you can see all Cruzeiro goals here.
In the final 2nd leg, the rain transformed the pitch into a mud. Santos ended the first half with a 2-0 advantage, with Pelé scoring once - things seemed to have come back to normal. But they only seemed, as Cruzeiro score three times in the second half, at '63, '73 and '89, besides missing a penalty at '57. First with Tostão from this nice free-kick, then with Dirceu Lopes and Natal. It was over, Cruzeiro had beaten Pelé's Santos and were crowned Brazilian League champions for the first time. Highlights to goalkeeper Raul, who operated miracles throughout the second match and to defensive midfielder Piazza, who made Pelé disappear on the pitch.
This victory meant a lot in the development of Brazil's National League: the 1967 Rio-São Paulo Tournament (interstate league) was then opened and enlarged to teams from the states of Minas Gerais (Cruzeiro, Atlético Mineiro) and Rio Grande do Sul (Grêmio, Internacional), as a recognition of their level, thus creating a new Brazilian League, more condensed and elitized, gathering the best teams from 4 states, rather than the old democratic (but less competitive) format which gathered 21 states.
Cruzeito kept collecting State League titles against their archrival Atlético Mineiro: 5 in a row between 1965 and 1969, then 4 in a row between 1972 and 1975 - 9 titles in 12 years, Cruzeiro's best rate until today. Highlights to Roberto Perfumo, prestigious Argentine center-back, elected to Argentina all-time dream team, who played in 138 matches for Cruzeiro between 1971-74.
In 1969, they finished second to Palmeiras in the Brazilian League, due to just 1 fewer goal on the goal difference (1x2).
In 1974, they finished second to Vasco in the Brazilian League. They had a greater goal difference (2x1) but the rule determined an extra match, which Cruzeiro lost 1-2.
1976: the first Copa Libertadores title
After losing the 1975 Brazilian League final 0-1 to Internacional, Cruzeiro picked the second spot to the 1976 Copa Libertadores.
Only 1 of 4 teams would advance from their group stage, shared with Internacional, and the Paraguayans Olimpia and Sportivo Luqueño. It was pretty much clear that the spot would go either to Cruzeiro or Internacional: they met on the first match, a crazy 5-4 victory to Cruzeiro, who was never behind in the score - they were leading 3-1, Internacional tied at '51, Cruzeiro took the lead again, but Internacional tied at '70, before Cruzeiro closed the coffin at '84 from a penalty kick.
In the second group stage, Cruzeiro demolished Ecuadorians and Peruvians with 4 easy wins: 3-1, 4-0, 7-1, 4-1. They qualified to the big final against River Plate with a 9W-1D campaign, scoring 38 goals in 10 matches.
In the final 1st leg, Cruzeiro demolished the Argentines, beating them 4-1 at home. In the second leg, however, they were beaten 1-2 at the Monumental stadium in Argentina, and the title would be decided in an extra match, in Chile.
In the 3rd and decisive match, Cruzeiro had opened 2-0 at '55 with Nelinho and Eduardo, but River Plate reacted and scored at '59 and '64. At '88, Joãozinho scored the title goal from a free-kick, and Cruzeiro were declared South American champions for the first time, the second Brazilian team to do so.
Palhinha was the topscorer, with 13 goals in 11 matches. The South American level was so crazy back then, that no Cruzeiro player was included in the South American POTY shortlist, with the likes of Figueroa (1st), Zico (2nd) and Rivellino (3rd) making it.
This title qualified Cruzeiro to the 1976 Intercontinental Cup against European champions Bayern München. However, they lost the title over two legs - a 0-2 defeat in Germany and a 0-0 tie in Brazil.
In 1977, Cruzeiro entered the Copa Libertadores on the second stage, as current champions, where they beat Internacional and Portuguesa. In the finals, Boca Juniors beat them 5-4 in the penalties on the third match (0-1, 1-0, 0-0).
Player Period Apps Goals Brazil NT Caps Goals World Cup att.
Raul 1965-78 557 - 8 - -
Piazza 1963-78 566 40 59 36 2 (1970, 1974)
Tostão 1964-71 378 249 65 36 2 (1966, 1970)
Dirceu Lopes 1964-77 594 224 19 4 -
Nelinho 1973-82 427 105 21 6 2 (1974, 1978)
Palhinha 1969-76 434 145 16 6 -
Joãozinho 1973-82 482 116 6 1 -
Jairzinho 1976 24 15 105 44 3 (1966, 1970, 1974)
1990s: international glory, birth of Ronaldo Nazário, and Copa do Brasil supremacy
Cruzeiro vanished from the domestic and international scene in the 1980s, collecting just two state league titles in 1984 and 1987.
The 1990s however marked the rebirth of the Fox. They won 6 international titles (1 Libertadores, 2 Supercopa Libertadores, 1 Recopa, 1 Copa Ouro, 1 Copa Master), 3 Copa do Brasil, and saw the uprising of Ronaldo Nazário between 1993 and 1994.
1991-92: back-to-back Supercopa Libertadores titles
The Supercopa Libertadores (1988-97) gathered all the teams who had already conquered the prestigious Copa Libertadores, in a knock-out tournament, that would give a spot in the Recopa Sudamericana.
In 1991, Cruzeiro won it after 8 matches (2W-4D-2L), beating Colo-Colo (Chile) (0-0, 0-0, p.k. 4-3), Nacional (Uruguay) (4-0, 0-3), Olimpia (Paraguay) (1-1, 0-0, p.k. 5-4) and River Plate (Argentina) (0-2, 3-0) in the final.
Highlights to Cruzeiro comeback in the big final, scoring 3 goals on the return leg at home (6mn video), in front of 70.000 spectators. It was Cruzeiro's second international trophy, the second won against River Plate.
In the 1992 title campaign, Cruzeiro beat Atlético Nacional (Colombia) (1-1, 8-0), River Plate (Argentina) (2-0, 0-2, p.k. 5-4), Olimpia (Paraguay) (1-0, 2-2), and Racing (Argentina) (4-0, 0-1) in the final.
The next year, Cruzeiro won their first Copa do Brasil, which had been launched in 1989. They beat Nautico (0-1, 2-0) with this nice qualiyfing-goal after a nutmeg from Nonato. Then they beat the reserves of São Paulo in the quarter-finals, and Vasco in the semis (3-1, 1-1). The final would be against Grêmio, the Brazilian Rei de Copas (King of Cups). First leg away ended 0-0, and at home Cruzeiro won 2-1, with the winning goal coming from a header at '65.
In those years, however, Cruzeiro lost two Recopa Sudamericana to the Libertadores champions Colo-Colo, in 1992, and São Paulo, in 1993.
1993: Ronaldo Nazário, the birth of a legend
At the age of 16, Ronaldo made his professional debut for Cruzeiro. In that 1993 season, Ronaldo played only 29 matches of the team's 62 over the year, and still managed to score 28 goals, being the topscorer. He notably scored 12 goals in 14 Brazilian League matches, and 8 goals (topscorer) in 4 Supercopa Libertadores' matches. In the Supercopa Libertadores, he scored a hat-trick and a brace against Colo-Colo (Chile), a brace against Nacional (Uruguay), before his team fell on penalties.
He also scored 5 goals on the same league match against Bahia, notably this funny/iconic one against the celebrated Uruguayan goalkeeper Rodolfo Rodriguez.
The next season, in 1994, Ronaldo kept destroying his adversaries, before leaving to PSV. He scored 28 in 29 matches, 22 of them in the state league (which Cruzeiro won undefeated), and a special historical one against Boca Juniors in the Copa Libertadores, where he performed his traditional arrancada, going from the midfield past 4 adversaries, including the goalkeeper, before scoring.
He was called and won the 1994 World Cup with Brazil, before leaving Cruzeiro, having scored 56 goals in 58 matches.
Player Period Apps Goals Brazil NT Caps Goals World Cup att.
Ronaldo Nazário 1993-94 58 56 105 67 4 (1994, 1998, 2002, 2006)
1996-97: Cruzeiro's second Copa do Brasil and Copa Libertadores titles
As complete underdogs, Cruzeiro won for the second time the Copa do Brasil and the prestigious Copa Libertadores.
In 1996 Copa do Brasil, Cruzeiro demolished Vasco in the round of 16, beating them 6-2 and then tying 1-1. In the quarter-finals, they smashed the good Corinthians of Edmundo and Marcelinho 4-0 and advanced to the semis, where they tied twice against Flamengo (1-1, 0-0). The big final would be against the stellar team of Palmeiras, of the monsters Cafu, Júnior, Djalminha, Luizão and Rivaldo. Cruzeiro had Dida, who saved this shot at the end of the first leg, Marcelo Ramos, who scored the tying goal and the excellent/multichampion Palhinha. The 1-1 tie at home wasn't great, but Cruzeiro somehow managed to beat Palmeiras 2-1 away in the 2nd leg, in a great comeback.
Palmeiras opened the score at '6 with this majestic Djalminha-to-Rivaldo-to-Luizão goal - everyone was expecting a large win by Palmeiras. But Cruzeiro tied at '25 with Roberto Gaucho, after Amaral childish mistake.
In the second half, Dida appeared. The goalkeeper made several great defenses, which prevented Cruzeiro from suffering a massacre. The excellent Palhinha answered with this touch of finesse, saved by Velloso. At '85, Marcelo Ramos scored the winning goal and Cruzeiro were Copa do Brasil champions.
This title qualified Cruzeiro to the 1997 Copa Libertadores.
1997: Copa Libertadores title, Cruzeiro are continental champions again
After 21 years, Cruzeiro won the Copa Libertadores for the second time. Unlike their 1976 squad, the team had a difficult time, with 7W-1D-5L.
The team began with 3 defeats on the group stage (1-2, 0-1, 0-1), one at home against Grêmio and two away, against Peruvian teams Alianza Lima and Sporting Cristal. Cruzeiro needed at least two wins to be part of the 3 teams to advance: they beat Grêmio 1-0 away, then Alianza Lima 2-0 at home, and - already qualified - 2-1 against Sporting Cristal.
In the ro16, Cruzeiro lost the 1st leg away to El Nacional, 0-1. In the return leg, Cruzeiro opened 2-0, but the match ended 2-1, going to the penalties - where the star Dida defended two, and Cruzeiro advanced to the next stage.
Grêmio would be their opponent in the quarter-finals, and playing the first leg at home in the Mineirão, Cruzeiro won 2-0. In the 2nd leg, Cruzeiro opened 1-0, conceded two goals, and left the Olimpico stadium with a 1-2 defeat and qualified to the semis.
In the semi-finals, Cruzeiro met Colo-Colo. In the first leg, at home, the Brazilians won 1-0, after this master-dumb action by Colo-Colo goalkeeper. In Chile, Cruzeiro were losing 1-3, until they scored this savior goal at '63, taking it to the penalties. Dida star shone again, as he defended two penalties and put Cruzeiro on the final.
In the final against Sporting Cristal, the first match would be played in Peru, which was pretty balanced and ended 0-0. In Brazil, Dida saved Cruzeiro again, before Elivelto scored the title goal at '75. Cruzeiro were crowned Copa Libertadores champions for the second time.
However, Cruzeiro only escaped relegation in the national league on the last match - the board only cared about the Intercontinental Cup in December against European champions Borussia Dortmund. They got Bebeto and Donizete on loan just for this match, but they lost it 0-2.
1998: the runner-up season
Cruzeiro increased a lot in 1998 with the arrivals of Fabio Junior, Müller and Valdo.
They finished 2nd in the Brazilian League, in the Copa do Brasil and in the Copa Mercosul. However, they won the State League for the third time in a row, and also won the Recopa Sudamericana against River Plate (2-0, 3-0). In the Copa Libertadores, they were knocked out in the round of 16 by the eventual champions, Vasco.
Dida left at the end of the season to Milan.
2000: third Copa do Brasil title, and the end of a glorious decade
Cruzeiro played 13 matches, with 8W-5D, to secure the 2000 Copa do Brasil title. They notably beat Athletico (2-1, 2-2), Botafogo (3-2, 0-0), Santos (2-0, 2-2) and São Paulo (0-0, 2-1).
Highlights to the big final, against São Paulo. Cruzeiro tied the 1st leg away 0-0, and were losing 0-1 at home in the 2nd leg. At '80, Fabio Junior tied, but Cruzeiro needed one more goal. At '90, Giovanni scored from this free-kick, to the despair of goalkeeper Rogerio Ceni. São Paulo almost tied at '91, the match ended at '92, and Cruzeiro won the Copa do Brasil title for their third time.
Player Period Apps Goals Brazil NT Caps Goals World Cup att.
Dida 1994-98 209 - 92 - 3 (1998, 2002, 2006)
Cris 1999-04 260 25 16 1 1 (2006)
Sorín (Argentina) 2000-02 110 17 76 12 2 (2002, 2006)
Marcelo Djian 1998-00 96 5 - - -
Nonato 1991-97 339 22 3 - -
Valdo 1998-00 52 11 65 6 2 (1986, 1990)
Ricardinho 1994-02 411 45 3 - -
Palhinha 1996-97 55 18 16 5 -
Marcelo Ramos 1995-96, 97-00, 01-03 345 162 2 1 -
Fabio Junior 1997-98, 2000 65 30 3 - -
Elivelton 1997-98 20 5 13 1 -
Müller 1998-00 93 24 59 12 3 (1986, 1990, 1994)
Oséas 2000-01 130 55 2 - -
Roberto Gaúcho 1992-97 113 25 - - -
2003: the dream year
Luxemburgo, former Palmeiras, Corinthians and Brazil NT coach, took the job in late 2002, when the team was threatened of relegation, but got saved.
The new coach started building the team for the following season, and the result was an unprecedented national triple crown conquest, with the titles of the State League, the Copa do Brasil and the Brasileirão. Since the creation of the Copa do Brasil in 1989, the only teams that got close to winning both the Copa and the League was Cruzeiro in 1998, finishing second in both, and Corinthians in 2002, winning the Copa and losing the league's final.
But in 2003, Cruzeiro had a powerful and demolishing team that won it all. They started winning the State League undefeated, with 10W-2D. In the Copa do Brasil, they played 11 matches, with 8W-3D, beating Vasco (2-1, 1-1), Goiás (3-2, 2-1) and Flamengo (1-1, 3-1) in the final. Highlights to this back-heel goal by Alex in the final 1st leg. Despite winning the Copa, Cruzeiro still had to prove themselves in the league, because between 2001 and 2012 the best teams in Brazil weren't allowed to play the Copa do Brasil, so that they could focus in the Copa Libertadores.
The 2003 Brazilian League was the first one with a double round-robin and no play-offs in the history of the league. Cruzeiro biggest adversary were Santos, current Brazilian champions and runner-up of the Copa Libertadores, hyped by the upcoming talents of Diego and Robinho. But Cruzeiro had Alex, the most capped Brazilian player in history not to be called to a World Cup, a Palmeiras, Coritiba and Fenerbahçe idol. With him leading the team as a 10, they reached a rate of 72% on the league, over 46 matches, with a win rate of 67%. Cruzeiro led the league all the way around since the 8th round through the 46th round, with the exception of 2 rounds that Santos quickly led (16 and 28). Cruzeiro notably beat Santos 2-0 away and 3-0 at home, the latter match being seen as the most decisive of the league, in which Cruzeiro showed no mercy or fatigue. Until Flamengo's 2019 campaign, this was considered the most dominant display by a team in the "Double Round-Robin National League Era (since 2003)". However, the quality of the national league in 2003 was a couple of tiers above the 2019 one, making Cruzeiro accomplishment relatively more difficult to achieve than 2019 Flamengo's.
Until today, 2003 Cruzeiro is seen as the most powerful Brazilian team of the 21st century, along with 2010 Santos and 2019 Flamengo - in terms of aesthetics, strenght and superiority.
However, the team dismantled in early 2004, and couldn't reach higher levels anymore.
This 48mn documentary tells the whole story of Cruzeiro triple-crown season. Three Cruzeiro players were elected to the League Best XI, namely Maurinho, Maldonado and Alex, the latter also winning the League Golden Ball.
Player Period Apps Goals Brazil NT Caps Goals World Cup att.
Gomes 2002-04 108 - 12 - 1 (2010)
Maurinho 2003-06 107 5 2 - -
Maicon 2000-04 101 3 77 7 2 (2010, 2014)
Edu Dracena 2003-06 131 11 3 - -
Luisão 2000-03 114 13 47 3 2 (2006, 2010)
Augusto Recife 2002-04 144 2 - - -
Maldonado (Chile) 2003-05 116 4 41 1 -
Alex 2001-04 123 63 51 12 -
Aristizabal (Colombia) 2003-04 80 36 66 15 2 (1994, 1998)
Deivid 2003 37 28 - - -
Mota 2003-04 57 24 - - -
You can see some highlights of the maestro Alex in this video (5mn), but make sure to check this goal, also this one and this one.
2013-14: back-to-back Brazilian League champions
After Cruzeiro's 2003 dream season, they reached the Copa Libertadores final in 2009, traumatically losing the final 1-2 at home to Estudiantes, after opening the score at '51 - they tied the 1st leg 0-0 in Argentina. In 2010, Cruzeiro was the Brazilian League runner-up. On the last league match in 2011, Cruzeiro feared relegation, but won the historical derby against their archrival Atlético Mineiro by the score of 6-1, a derby record. Cruzeiro also won some state leagues here and there, but never managed in their whole history to surpass Atlético Mineiro in overall state league titles - the closest was in 1930, when they had 3 titles each.
In 2013 and 2014 Cruzeiro won back-to-back Brazilian League titles, reaching the number of 4 titles (1966, 2003, 2013, 2014). In 2013, Cruzeiro led 26 of 38 rounds, and had 5 players elected to the League's Best XI: Fábio, Mayke, Dedé, Nilton, and Golden Ball winner, Éverton Ribeiro. In 2014, Cruzeiro led 32 of 38 league rounds, all consecutively since the 6th round - a league record, until 2017 Corinthians (33 leading rounds). Cruzeiro also had 2 players elected to the League's Best XI: Lucas Silva and Golden Ball winner, Ricardo Goulart. Later that season, they had a shot at winning their second national triple crown, but lost the Copa do Brasil final to their archrival Atlético Mineiro (0-2, 0-1).
Highlights to this golaço of Éverton Ribeiro against Flamengo in the 2013 Copa do Brasil.
Player Period Apps Goals
Fábio 2005- 897 -
Dedé 2013- 194 18
Mayke 2013-18 138 3
Egídio 2013-14, 17-19 199 4
Nilton 2013-14 91 11
Lucas Silva 2011-14, 17-19 190 6
Henrique 2008-11, 13-19 521 27
Everton Ribeiro 2013-15 117 24
Ricardo Goulart 2013-14 115 42
Borges 2012-14 75 28
Dagoberto 2013-15 81 23
Marcelo Moreno (Bolivia) 2007-08, 2014, 2020- 103 47
Willian 2013-16 185 40
2017-2018: back-to-back Copa do Brasil champions
In 2017, Cruzeiro won their 5th Copa do Brasil title, with 7W-5D-2L. From the quarter-finals until the title, they won either on penalties or on away goal: against Palmeiras (3-3, 1-1), the qualifying goal came at home with this header at '84, then against Grêmio (0-1, 1-0, p.k. 3-2) with Fábio saving Luan's last penalty, and the final against Flamengo (1-1, 0-0, p.k. 5-3 - no away goal rule), with Fábio saving Diego's penalty.
In 2018, Cruzeiro won their 6th Copa do Brasil title, a national record, with 5W-2D-1L. They beat Athletico in the round of 16 (2-1, 1-1), Santos in the quarter-finals (1-0, 1-2, p.k. 3-0) with Fábio saving all three Santos penalties (Bruno Henrique, Rodrygo, Jean Mota), Palmeiras in the semis (1-0, 1-1), and finally Corinthians in the big final (1-0, 2-1), with this nice chipping last goal from Arrascaeta.
Player Period Apps Goals
Ezequiel 2016-18 70 1
Léo 2010- 380 19
Diogo Barbosa 2017 59 2
Alisson 2012-17 161 22
Rafinha 2016-18 125 11
Robinho 2016-2020 176 23
Rafael Sóbis 2016-18 116 24
Arrascaeta (Uruguay) 2015-18 186 49
2019-today
In 2019, Cruzeiro went from being title favorites to being relegated to Serie B. Not only the club went through a huge financial/debt crisis, but also the club's expensive players chose not to care about the results - a shameful and enormous disengagement led by Cruzeiro's biggest villain and conspirator, the midfielder Thiago Neves. The club now fights against FIFA-debts punishments and is in the Serie B relegation zone to Serie C.
To this day, Cruzeiro has a fanbase of 7 million supporters, and a stadium attendance average of 24.200, as of 2019.
If you have any questions about Brazilian football, feel free to join us at futebol, where you'll be very welcomed!
submitted by majinmattossj2 to soccer [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 11:05 TiberiusIX Case study 2: Ezoic, content outsourcing and moer

One of the things to come out of my first case study last month was a suggestion to switch to Ezoic for one of my sites.
I done this, and revenue increased by close to double - so thanks to ljc2424 for that suggestion! The approval process went fine (took a few days for Ezoic approval, and another couple of days for Google AdExchange to approve me). Unfortunately I'm having more trouble getting my third site switched to Ezoic... more on this later.
To recap briefly on my three sites - they're all informational (although there's some affiliate potential):

Traffic stats and earnings

The traffic stats I gave in my previous case study were straight from AdSense, but this month I'll look at Analytics for the traffic and AdSense/Ezoic for the revenue. Data doesn't include today.
August Analytics August Revenue September Analytics September Revenue
Website 1 2k users $9.06 2.5k users $20.01
Website 2 19k users $187.91 16k users $305
Website 3 15k users $140.65 25k users $307.96
In other words, a very good improvement over last month for revenue! I'm going to start re-investing some of this money in websites 1 and 2 (whilst continuing to produce content myself for website 3).
Before I go into that, one thing worth noting is the traffic decrease for website 2. This coincided with switching to Ezoic but on looking at it more, I think it's down to seasonal traffic effects. Google Trends shows that interest in this niche decreases from September onwards, and recovers in February/March. I use Rankinity to track the SERPs and that hasn't shown a decrease in my rankings, so I think/hope that it is just seasonal.

Ezoic

So switching to Ezoic has clearly been good for website 2's revenue, and the approval process went fairly smoothly (even if their staff seem quite busy, meaning that I'd typically just get a single reply each day).
After seeing the revenue increase and determining that website 2's traffic slide wasn't related to the switch to Ezoic, I submitted website 3 for approval. I thought that this would be a slam-dunk, since it's growing very quickly, it's all high quality content and it's now earning more on AdSense than website 2 is on Ezoic.
Unfortunately I had a bounce-back from my account manager, who's "out of the office for the foreseeable future due to unforeseen circumstances". So I got in touch with support, who put me in touch with someone else. They looked at my Analytics and asked whether my 90% bounce rate was typical.
I said that it was and it mainly seemed down to my ranking articles predominantly being "question and answer" type replies. I.e. once the user's question has been answered, many don't click around the site much. Ezoic's own blog posts say that anything from 70-98% is normal enough for a blog, but apparently this has concerned the platform quality team. I didn't want to tell them that website 2 has the same bounce rate and is doing fine on Ezoic..!
So they've asked me to switch my nameservers to Ezoic (whilst keeping the traffic routing to my 'old site' with AdSense ads) so they can capture their own UX data. The new account manager I'm speaking to seems like a good guy and is apparently eager to get me approved, but right now it seems like I've had a 'soft rejection' based purely on my Analytics.
Hopefully Ezoic's own UX data capture yields better results, because I'd like to get website 3 onto Ezoic and have a similar revenue boost to website 2. Worst case, I'll keep plugging away at website 3 until it meets MediaVine's new traffic requirements of 50k sessions (it had 29k sessions in September).

The future - content outsourcing and website 1 re-build

With a second child on the way in a couple of months, and revenue starting to be decent, my mind's turning to content outsourcing as a way of growing websites 1 and 2.
I've been quite interested in how different 'authority figures' approach this:
Whenever I've outsourced before and paid around 2 cents per word (to TextBroker and iWriter), I've had quite unreliable results. I've had much better results with TextBroker 4 star (2.7 cents a word) and Content Development Pros 5 stars (4 cents a word using the Fat Stacks discount, and paid via a monthly subscription).
In terms of how much to pay per word... whilst I do want to publish genuinely helpful articles with minimal waffle, I'm also concious that you can easily overpay for 'quality content' (Fat Stacks Blog done a case study comparing iWriter, TextBroker and WritersAccess at different levels, and articles above 4 cents a word usually didn't translate into substantially better content). I'll probably try and pay 2-3 cents a word, possibly hiring direct via UpWork.
In terms of my plans, I'll probably outsource a couple of articles a month to website 2 to keep it ticking along, but I can actually see a lot of potential in website 1 - despite my earlier mistakes and it being a competitive niche.
So I'm aiming to invest $400/month of content into website 1 (maybe less to begin with), along with restructuring it and re-organising it so that it has less cruft and more growing potential.
That's about it - thanks for reading folks!
submitted by TiberiusIX to juststart [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 10:09 thehariharan Post Match Analysis Thread: FC Barcelona vs Villarreal CF [Stats Only]

Post Match Analysis Thread: FC Barcelona vs Villarreal CF [Stats Only]
BTP Passmap and Average Positioning
BTP xG Progression (3.06 - 0.15)
BTP Passmap Progression (GIF)
WhoScored Average Positions
Understat xG (3.51 - 0.24)
Understat xG Progression
AS Stat Page Average Positioning (Barca)
AS Stat Page Average Positioning (Barca with Subs)
AS Stat Page Average Positioning (Villarreal)
AS Stat Page Average Positioning (Villarreal with Subs)
InfoGol xG Plot (2.96 - 0.31)
FbRef xG (2.6 - 0.2)

As done in the previous analysis, I will split my stats into 15 min intervals.

FIRST HALF:


0-15:

Barca Heat Map
Villarreal Heat Map
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Stats for 0-15:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 67.2% 32.8%
Shots 2 0
Shots on Target 1 0
Passes Attempted 149 75
Successful Passes 141 72
Key Passes 2 0
Final 3rd Passes 47 18
Dribbles Attempted 2 0
Successful Dribbles 1 0
Tackles Attempted 0 2
Successful Tackles 0 1
Interceptions 2 4
Clearances 1 3
Touches 162 95
Loss of Possession 3 1
Saves 0 0
Goals 1 0
xG 0.14 0.00
Pretty dominating performance from the team. Standout performers were Alba and Fati for me. Alba alone made 17 progressive passes in these15 mins, and Fati of course with the stunning finish for the goal. Lenglet's pass to Alba was just exquisite. (https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7whpq0)

15-30:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Stats for 15-30:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 52.3% 47.7%
Shots 5 0
Shots on Target 3 0
Passes Attempted 113 101
Successful Passes 107 95
Key Passes 4 0
Final 3rd Passes 36 21
Dribbles Attempted 0 1
Successful Dribbles 0 0
Tackles Attempted 4 0
Successful Tackles 4 0
Interceptions 1 0
Clearances 1 3
Touches 129 123
Loss of Possession 1 6
Saves 0 1
Goals 1 0
xG Accumulated 1.22 0
xG Indp 1.08 0
Coutinho's half field carry and accurate final pass to Fati, was something else.

30-HT:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Stats for 30-HT:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 61.4% 38.6%
Shots 2 3
Shots on Target 2 0
Attempted Passes 133 80
Successful Passes 125 70
Key Passes 1 2
Final Third Passes 45 29
Dribbles Attempted 4 5
Successful Dribbles 4 3
Tackles Attempted 6 4
Successful Tackles 3 0
Interceptions 2 0
Clearances 2 0
Touches 164 100
Loss of Possession 2 2
Saves 0 1
Goals 2 0
xG Acc 2.41 0.11
xG Indp 1.19 0.11
Another dominant performance from the team. Fati, Couts and Messi all had 100% dribble success rate in this half and Lenglet, Messi and Busi all had 100% tackle success rate too.

OVERALL FIRST HALF:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

First Half Stats:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 60.8% 39.2%
Shots 8 3
Shots on Target 5 0
Passes Attempted 391 246
Successful Passes 369 227
Key Passes 6 2
Final Third Passes 121 68
Attempted Dribbles 6 6
Successful Dribbles 5 3
Tackles Attempted 10 6
Successful Tackles 7 1
Interceptions 5 4
Clearances 4 6
Touches 448 305
Loss of Possession 6 9
Saves 0 2
Goals 4 0
xG Acc 2.41 0.11
Barca absolutely killed it in the first half. Fati, Alba and Messi were the standout performers in this half. We dominated almost every single stat.

SECOND HALF:

45-60:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Stats for 45-60:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 57.5% 42.5%
Shots 2 1
Shots on Target 1 0
Passes Attempted 139 104
Successful Passes 136 95
Key Passes 2 1
Final Third Passes 41 26
Attempted Dribbles 4 5
Successful Dribbles 2 3
Tackles Attempted 5 4
Successful Tackles 2 2
Interceptions 1 2
Clearances 5 0
Touches 158 124
Loss of Possession 2 1
Saves 0 1
Goals 0 0
xG Acc 2.67 0.15
xG Indp 0.16 0.04

60-75:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Stats for 60-75:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 60.5% 39.5%
Shots 2 0
Shots on Target 1 0
Passes Attempted 116 80
Successful Passes 110 73
Key Passes 2 0
Final Third Passes 25 26
Attempted Dribbles 3 3
Successful Dribbles 3 2
Tackles Attempted 3 6
Successful Tackles 1 3
Interceptions 1 0
Clearances 2 0
Touches 135 96
Loss of Possession 3 1
Saves 0 1
Goals 0 0
xG Acc 3.13 0.15
xG Indp 0.46 0

75-FT:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Stats for 75-FT:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 41.6% 58.4%
Shots 5 2
Shots on Target 2 1
Passes Attempted 105 132
Successful Passes 99 132
Key Passes 3 2
Final Third Passes 49 36
Attempted Dribbles 4 4
Successful Dribbles 3 3
Tackles Attempted 4 6
Successful Tackles 1 3
Interceptions 2 4
Clearances 5 1
Touches 137 161
Loss of Possession 3 4
Saves 1 2
Goals 0 0
xG Acc 3.51 0.24
xG Indp 0.38 0.09

OVERALL SECOND HALF:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

Second Half Stats:
PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 52.8% 47.2%
Shots 9 3
Shots on Target 4 1
Passes Attempted 350 310
Successful Passes 332 295
Key Passes 7 3
Final Third Passes 113 87
Attempted Dribbles 11 10
Successful Dribbles 8 7
Tackles Attempted 10 16
Successful Tackles 3 8
Interceptions 3 6
Clearances 12 1
Touches 418 371
Loss of Possession 8 6
Saves 1 4
Goals 0 0
xG Acc 3.51 0.24
xG Indp 1.1 0.13

HALVES COMPARISON:


PARTICULARS BARCA FIRST HALF BARCA SECOND HALF
Possession 60.8% 52.8%
Shots 8 9
Shots on Target 5 4
Passes Attempted 391 350
Successful Passes 369 332
Key Passes 6 7
Final Third Passes 121 113
Attempted Dribbles 6 11
Successful Dribbles 5 8
Tackles Attempted 10 10
Successful Tackles 7 3
Interceptions 5 3
Clearances 4 12
Touches 448 418
Loss of Possession 6 8
Saves 0 1
Goals 4 0
xG Acc 2.41 3.51
xG Indp 2.41 1.1


PARTICULARS VILLARREAL FIRST HALF VILLARREAL SECOND HALF
Possession 39.2% 47.2%
Shots 3 3
Shots on Target 0 1
Passes Attempted 246 310
Successful Passes 227 295
Key Passes 2 3
Final Third Passes 68 87
Attempted Dribbles 6 10
Successful Dribbles 3 7
Tackles Attempted 6 16
Successful Tackles 1 8
Interceptions 4 6
Clearances 6 1
Touches 305 371
Loss of Possession 9 6
Saves 2 4
Goals 0 0
xG Acc 0.11 0.24
xG Indp 0.11 0.13

OVERALL 90 MINS STATS:

Barca Heatmap
Villarreal Heatmap
Action Zones
Areas of Influence

PARTICULARS BARCA VILLARREAL
Possession 56.6% 43.3%
Shots 17 6
Shots on Target 9 1
Passes Attempted 722 551
Successful Passes 685 517
Key Passes 13 5
Final Third Passes 230 155
Attempted Dribbles 17 16
Successful Dribbles 13 10
Tackles Attempted 20 22
Successful Tackles 10 9
Interceptions 8 10
Clearances 16 7
Touches 847 670
Loss of Possession 14 15
Saves 1 6
Goals 4 0
xG Acc 3.51 0.24
PPDA 14.95 19.15
Fouls 9 10

INDIVIDUAL PLAYER STATS:

Taken from FBRef.com.

PASSING STATS:

Attributes taken into consideration are Passing Accuracy, Total Dist Covered in Passes (Yards), Progressive Passes, Progressive Dist in Passes (Yards), Assists, xA, KP, Final Third Passes, Passes under Pressure and Passes into the Penalty Box.

https://preview.redd.it/cd2o9ewkr8q51.png?width=857&format=png&auto=webp&s=2c79dbe29ca881e99bab7b945c007035f9d942f4
Frenkie and Alba are absolute monsters in this regard. Frenkie had 8 passes out of pressure, twice as many as any other player. Alba's Progressive Passing distance is 569 yeards, followed by Lenglet (which was mainly on account of that long ball that led to the first goal), and Frenkie.


DRIBBLING AND POSSESSION:

Arrtibutes taken into consideration were Dribbling Succ %, Players Dribbled Past, Total Carries, Carry Distance, Progressive Carry Distance, Miscontrols, and Dispossessions.

https://preview.redd.it/0e94h9ryo8q51.png?width=748&format=png&auto=webp&s=9099e1e1677aa588a5b21dd6b9a06990cb366a44
Frenkie again leads the way in terms of Progressive Carry, at 329 yards. As seen in the game, Fati and Couts were also our primary ball carriers, and they come in 2 and 4 respectively.

DEFENSIVE ACTIONS:

Attributes taken into consideration were Tackle Succ %, Tackles Attmp split into Thirds, Tackles against Dribblers, Dribbled Past, Pressure Success %, Pressures Attempted split into Thirds, Interceptions, Clearances, and Errors.


https://preview.redd.it/m35ztimgq8q51.png?width=1235&format=png&auto=webp&s=2776d082030325441616561e008c83e8ae586927
Messi had the second highest pressures in the team at 14, and had a higher than average Pressure Success %.
Pjanic despite only playing 11 mins had 2 interceptions.
Frenkie sort of disappoints in this aspect, didn't have great luck with tackles and pressures and committed the only error of the game from our team.

GCA, SCA AND xG:

Attributes included are Goals, Assists, Shots, SoT, xG, xA, NPxG, SCA, GCA, Aerial Duel Succ %
https://preview.redd.it/ib1eo2osr8q51.png?width=816&format=png&auto=webp&s=19e6de855d2fb38edbebeb30de95df79afb4b075

Individual xG and xA figures from Understat.com
https://preview.redd.it/zzk3m9x9t8q51.png?width=1472&format=png&auto=webp&s=252f44fd07c57474368320cb97730c30eea73465
Fati had 2 shots, 2 SoT and 2 goals, his conversion rate is literally 100%. Insane!
For GCA and SCA, an overlap will occur, all the players involved in the buildup that led to the Shot or the Goal will be credited accordingly in their stats.
Aerial Duel Success Rate for everyone except Lenglet is 100%.

CONCLUSION and DISCLAIMERS:

This isn't an analysis by any means, just a mere compilation of stats and maps, if someone could use said data to make conclusions and analyses of the same, that'd be wonderful.
xG Acc and xG Indp presented in the tables are as per Understat.com and may vary from the xG figures of other sources.
All Measures of Distance are in Yards.
Individual stats are only for Barca players, didnt have the time and couldn't be arsed to make one for Villarreal.

Pretty great game, I hope the team maintains the same form and intensity throughout the season.

SOURCES:

  1. FBREF.com
  2. WhoScored.com
  3. resultados.as.com
  4. Understat.com
  5. Between the Posts (Twitter Handle)
  6. Infolgol.net (thanks to u/SubjectandObject)
  7. The Come On Man (Twitter Handle)
submitted by thehariharan to Barca [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 06:23 Significant-Notice- Where and when does herd immunity kick in?

Here is the abstract of a new paper by Axel SLexmond, Carlijn JANouwen, and John PaulCallan. So herd immunity yes, but at some point after fifty percent:
We have studied the evolution of COVID-19 in 12 low and middle income countries in which reported cases have peaked and declined rapidly in the past 2-3 months. In most of these countries the declines happened while control measures were consistent or even relaxing, and without signs of significant increases in cases that might indicate second waves. For the 12 countries we studied, the hypothesis that these countries have reached herd immunity warrants serious consideration. The Reed-Frost model, perhaps the simplest description for the evolution of cases in an epidemic, with only a few constant parameters, fits the observed case data remarkably well, and yields parameter values that are reasonable. The best-fitting curves suggest that the effective basic reproduction number in these countries ranged between 1.5 and 2.0, indicating that the curve was flattened in some countries but not suppressed by pushing the reproduction number below 1. The results suggest that between 51 and 80% of the population in these countries have been infected, and that between 0.05% and 2.50% of cases have been detected; values which are consistent with findings from serological and T-cell immunity studies. The infection rates, combined with data and estimates for deaths from COVID-19, allow us to estimate overall infection fatality rates for three of the countries. The values are lower than expected from reported infection fatality rates by age, based on data from several high-income countries, and the country population by age. COVID-19 may have a lower mortality risk in these three countries (to differing degrees in each country) than in high-income countries, due to differences in immune response, prior exposure to coronaviruses, disease characteristics or other factors. We find that the herd immunity hypothesis would not have fit the evolution of reported cases in several European countries, even just after the initial peaks; and subsequent resurgences of cases obviously prove that those countries have infection rates well below herd immunity levels. Our hypothesis that the 12 countries we studied have reached herd immunity should now be tested further, through serological and T cell immunity studies.
They offer an implied exposure estimate of 72% for Afghanistan, 67% for Ethiopia, 74% for Kenya, and 80% for Ethiopia. Pakistan clocks in at 72%, South Africa at 71%. Notice those are not case counts, rather it is working backwards, using a model, to infer exposure rates from the data we do have, assuming that not all cases are being measured.
Here is an earlier test of herd immunity theories for Europe31357-X/fulltext) that is still of relevance. Here is mostly good NYT coverage on herd immunity theories, though in my view unfair on T-Cell immunity issues — they confuse uncertainty with “there is no reason to believe anything here.” Here is a new and good NYT article on the Swedish approach. The different pieces still do not all fit together.
Via Alan Goldhammer.
The post Where and when does herd immunity kick in? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.
submitted by Significant-Notice- to marginal [link] [comments]


2020.09.30 01:41 smallstreetgains /r/wallstreetbets - Top Trending Data on 2020-09-29

Top trending tickers, sentiments, and options on /wallstreetbets for the day of September 29, 2020.

────────────────

Trending Tickers:

Ticker Company Mentions Bulls / Bears Price Change P/E
SPY Exchange Traded Fund 325 60.91% / 39.09% $332.37 -0.54% -
TSLA Tesla, Inc. 304 76.00% / 24.00% $419.07 -0.51% 1077.30
NKLA Nikola Corporation 296 60.32% / 39.68% $17.88 -7.36% -
NIO NIO Limited 265 80.14% / 19.86% $20.85 10.85% -
MU Micron Technology, In 203 72.29% / 27.71% $50.71 1.99% 25.35
AAPL Apple Inc. 166 88.24% / 11.76% $114.09 -0.76% 34.69
SPCE Virgin Galactic Holdi 164 72.73% / 27.27% $20.44 -0.34% -
PTON Peloton Interactive, 122 38.89% / 61.11% $100.47 3.67% -
ZM Zoom Video Communicat 116 57.63% / 42.37% $465.50 -4.54% 594.51
AMD Advanced Micro Device 95 86.05% / 13.95% $81.77 2.88% 162.56
GM General Motors Company 86 90.48% / 9.52% $28.74 -2.38% 27.37
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc. 80 91.18% / 8.82% $20.07 -2.90% 8.29
DKNG DraftKings Inc. 73 41.30% / 58.70% $55.74 -2.02% 1013.45
BA The Boeing Company 62 83.87% / 16.13% $163.60 -1.49% -
VXX Exchange Traded Fund 61 86.49% / 13.51% $24.94 -1.66% -
FB Facebook, Inc. 61 85.71% / 14.29% $261.79 1.94% 33.40
SLV Exchange Traded Fund 60 100.00% / 0.00% $22.50 2.18% -
GME GameStop Corp. 56 76.67% / 23.33% $10.35 2.58% -
DIS The Walt Disney Compa 51 80.00% / 20.00% $125.40 -0.47% -
────────────────

Trending Options:

Ticker Strike Type Expiration
RKT $25 Call 10/16
NIO $20 Call 10/2
TSLA $420 Call 10/2
HLX $4 Call 12/18
NIO $19 Call 10/2
AAPL $130 Call 10/16
SPY $358 Call 3/2021
MU $50 Put 10/16
SNE $80 Call 10/30
ZM $485 Put 10/2
FB $265 Call 10/9
SPCE $19 Put 10/2
AAPL $150 Call 10/16
GE $7 Call 11/20
KMI $15 Call 12/18
────────────────

Trending Sentiment:

Sentiment Comments %
Bullish 1321 63.15%
Neutral 12260 -
Bearish 771 36.85%
────────────────

Other Data:

Overall Market Sentiment: Bullish
Comments Searched: 14352
Newly Trending Tickers: DIS
────────────────
You can view all top trending tickers on /RedditTickers.
Notice an error or have questions? Reply to this post or message smallstreetgains.
Financial data provided by finviz.
submitted by smallstreetgains to RedditTickers [link] [comments]


2020.09.29 23:16 Euronotus Marie (18E - Eastern Pacific)


Other discussions

Weekly Global Outlook & Discussion

15W - Kujira

Latest news

Last updated: Tuesday, 29 September 3:05 PM MDT (21:05 UTC)

Marie becomes the thirteenth named cyclone of the 2020 Pacific hurricane season

Satellite imagery analysis over the past several hours indicates that a tropical depression which formed to the southwest of Mexico earlier this morning has continued to organize and strengthen and has reached tropical storm strength. Microwave imagery collected earlier this morning indicates that the depression's low-level circulation has become better defined and hints that more substantial intensification may be about to occur. Conventional satellite imagery depicts the low-level center tucked beneath an expanding central dense overcast and robust poleward outflow enhanced by an upper-level ridge situated to the southwest.
Intensity estimates derived from satellite imagery analysis, to include recent scatterometer data, indicate that the depression has strengthened over the past few hours, with maximum one-minute sustained winds increasing to 35 knots (65 kilometers per hour). The National Hurricane Center has upgraded the cyclone to a tropical storm and have assigned it the name Marie, making it the thirteenth named cyclone to form so far this season. Marie continues to move toward the west under the steering influence of a mid-level high which remains anchored over the southwestern United States.
Latest data NHC Advisory #3 3:00 PM MDT (21:00 UTC)
Current location: 13.6°N 109.5°W 509 miles (818 km) SW of Manzanillo, Mexico
Forward motion: W (275°) at 12 knots (19 km/h)
Maximum winds: 35 knots (65 km/h)
Intensity: Tropical Storm
Minimum pressure: 1005 millibars (29.68 inches)

Forecast Discussion

Last updated: Tuesday, 29 September 3:05 PM MDT (21:05 UTC)

Marie is expected to steadily intensify over the next few days

Environmental conditions over the eastern Pacific remain favorable for significant development over the next few days. While model guidance suggests that a slight increase in northeasterly shear may occur over the next twelve hours, the shear is expected to drop below 10 knots by Wednesday morning. This, combined with very warm sea-surface temperatures, very strong diffluence aloft, and abundant mid-level moisture, may allow Marie to rapidly intensify over the next few days.
Most model guidance brings Marie to hurricane strength within the next 24 hours; the National Hurricane Center forecast lags slightly behind this consensus to maintain continuity with the previous forecast. The GFS-based SHIPS output suggests an increasing chance that Marie will undergo rapid intensification over the next few days, indicating a 30% chance that the storm's maximum winds will increase to 90 knots (165 kilometers per hour) within the next two days, while also indicating a 39% chance that the storm's winds could reach 100 knots (185 kilometers per hour) within the next three days.
The most recent official forecast from the National Hurricane Center calls for Marie to reach hurricane strength sometime during the late evening hours on Wednesday. Marie is expected to increase to Category 2 hurricane strength by Thursday afternoon and reach Category 3 major hurricane strength later that night. After this point, increasing southwesterly shear associated with an approaching mid-latitude trough, combined with cooler sea-surface temperatures, will begin to weaken Marie as it begins to turn more toward the northwest along the southwestern corner of the steering ridge.

Official Forecast

Last updated: Tuesday, 29 September 3:00 PM MDT (21:00 UTC)
Hour Date Time Intensity Winds - Lat Long
- - UTC MDT - knots km/h ºN ºW
00 29 Sep 18:00 12:00 Tropical Storm 35 65 13.6 109.5
12 30 Sep 06:00 00:00 Tropical Storm 45 85 13.9 111.6
24 30 Sep 18:00 12:00 Tropical Storm 60 110 14.6 114.5
36 01 Oct 06:00 00:00 Hurricane (Category 1) 75 140 14.9 117.5
48 01 Oct 18:00 12:00 Hurricane (Category 2) 90 165 15.3 120.3
60 02 Oct 06:00 00:00 Hurricane (Category 3) 100 185 16.0 122.7
72 02 Oct 18:00 12:00 Hurricane (Category 3) 100 185 17.2 124.9
96 03 Oct 18:00 12:00 Hurricane (Category 2) 85 155 19.6 128.5
120 04 Oct 18:00 12:00 Tropical Storm 60 110 21.4 131.6

Official information sources

National Hurricane Center

Satellite imagery

Floater imagery

Visible imagery

Infrared imagery

Water vapor imagery

Multispectral imagery

Microwave imagery

Multiple Bands

Regional imagery

Radar

Unavailable

This system is situated too far away from public-facing Doppler radar sites.

Analysis graphics and data

Wind analysis

Scatterometer data

EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Analysis Facility

Sea surface temperatures

Model guidance

Storm-Specific Guidance

Western Atlantic Guidance

submitted by Euronotus to TropicalWeather [link] [comments]


2020.09.29 21:17 investing-scientist2 This is my newest compilation of five CHEAP stocks possibly worth your attention #CAG #FSS #HWKN #MGIC #SNDR

This post was inspired by you - some of you wanted to see cheap alternatives to popular, expensive stocks

Here is a couple of CHEAP (priced below $50) stocks that might be worth your attention this week. This short list was compiled with help of various sources of data, including Buy recommendations from several renowned stock data providers and analytical services. This is why I'm calling the approach a consensus strategy. The stocks I'm going to present you below are generally believed to outperform the stock market in the coming months, they have a consensus recommendation of Buy, their fundamentals are scored considerably better than most stocks and their average target price by stock analysts is above current market valuation.
In order to consider buying the stock's shares, the following criteria need to be satisfied:
Notes:

If you decide to buy any of the below stocks, you might want to consider the following selling conditions (at least one of them should be satisfied):

Let's now take a look at the stocks I've identified with this strategy today.

CONAGRA BRANDS INC (CAG)

Sector: Consumer Non-Durables Industry: Food: Major Diversified Employees: 16500 Description: Conagra Brands, Inc. engages in the manufacture and sale of processed and packaged foods. It operates through the following segments: Grocery and Snacks; Refrigerated and Frozen; International; Foodservice; and Pinnacle Foods. Dividend: Conagra Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.85 per share, with a dividend yield of 2.39%. CAG's most recent quarterly dividend payment was made to shareholders of record on Thursday, September 3. The company has grown its dividend for the last 1 consecutive years and is increasing its dividend by an average of -5.27% each year. Conagra Brands pays out 37.28% of its earnings out as a dividend. Current valuation: $35.45

Valuation of entry parameters:
TheStreet score: A- Yahoo Finance recommendation: Buy MarketBeat recommendation: Buy Yahoo Finance target price: 38.06 Piotroski F-Score: 4 Moody’s Daily Credit Risk: 6 InvestorsObserver Overall Score: 67 Yahoo Finance estimated 1 year change: 7.36%

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP (FSS)

Sector: Producer Manufacturing Industry: Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery Employees: 3600 Description: Federal Signal Corp. engages in the designed manufacture of products and integrated solutions for municipal, governmental, industrial, and commercial customers. It operates through the Environmental Solutions Group, and Safety and Security Systems Group segments. Dividend: Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share, with a dividend yield of 1.08%. FSS's most recent quarterly dividend payment was made to shareholders of record on Friday, September 4. The company has grown its dividend for the last 1 consecutive years and is increasing its dividend by an average of 4.55% each year. Federal Signal pays out 17.88% of its earnings out as a dividend. Current valuation: $29.54

Valuation of entry parameters:
TheStreet score: A- Yahoo Finance recommendation: Buy MarketBeat recommendation: Buy Yahoo Finance target price: 35.25 Piotroski F-Score: 5 Moody’s Daily Credit Risk: 6 InvestorsObserver Overall Score: 60 Yahoo Finance estimated 1 year change: 19.33%

HAWKINS INC (HWKN)

Sector: Distribution Services Industry: Wholesale Distributors Employees: 656 Description: Hawkins, Inc. engaged in the distribution, blending, and manufacture of chemicals and specialty ingredients for a wide variety of industries. It operates through the following segments: Industrial, Water Treatment, and Health and Nutrition. Dividend: Hawkins pays an annual dividend of $0.93 per share, with a dividend yield of 2.00%. HWKN's most recent quarterly dividend payment was made to shareholders of record on Friday, August 28. The company has grown its dividend for the last 1 consecutive years and is increasing its dividend by an average of 3.91% each year. Hawkins pays out 34.96% of its earnings out as a dividend. Current valuation: $46.47

Valuation of entry parameters:
TheStreet score: A- Yahoo Finance recommendation: Buy MarketBeat recommendation: Buy Yahoo Finance target price: 62.0 Piotroski F-Score: 7 Moody’s Daily Credit Risk: 6 InvestorsObserver Overall Score: 68 Yahoo Finance estimated 1 year change: 33.42%

MAGIC SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES (MGIC)

Sector: Technology Services Industry: Packaged Software Employees: 2642 Description: Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. engages in the provision of proprietary application development and business process integration platforms, vertical software solutions, and vendor of information technology (IT) outsourcing software services. It operates through Software Services and IT Professional Services segments. Dividend: Magic Software Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share, with a dividend yield of 2.72%. MGIC's most recent semi annually dividend payment was made to shareholders of record on Thursday, September 10. The company has grown its dividend for the last 1 consecutive years and is increasing its dividend by an average of 20.47% each year. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 60.34% of its earnings out as a dividend. Current valuation: $12.86

Valuation of entry parameters:
TheStreet score: A- Yahoo Finance recommendation: Buy MarketBeat recommendation: Buy Yahoo Finance target price: 16.5 Piotroski F-Score: 4 Moody’s Daily Credit Risk: 4 InvestorsObserver Overall Score: 66 Yahoo Finance estimated 1 year change: 28.3%

SCHNEIDER NATIONAL INC (SNDR)

Sector: Transportation Industry: Trucking Employees: 15650 Description: Schneider National Inc. provides transportation and logistics services. The firm's transportation solutions include van truckload, dedicated, regional, bulk, intermodal, brokerage, supply chain management, port logistics services and engineering and freight payment services. It operates through the following segments: Truckload, Intermodal and Logistics. Dividend: Schneider National pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share, with a dividend yield of 1.03%. SNDR's next quarterly dividend payment will be made to shareholders of record on Thursday, October 8. Schneider National pays out 20.97% of its earnings out as a dividend. Current valuation: $25.23

Valuation of entry parameters:
TheStreet score: A- Yahoo Finance recommendation: Buy MarketBeat recommendation: Buy / Hold Yahoo Finance target price: 28.62 Piotroski F-Score: 5 Moody’s Daily Credit Risk: 4 InvestorsObserver Overall Score: 71 Yahoo Finance estimated 1 year change: 13.44%

Now, a few words on the criteria I'm using and sources of data.
1. TheStreet score
The first filtering step is to get stocks with Buy recommendation at TheStreet stock screener (https://www.thestreet.com/ratings/reports/ir-screener.html). I'm only keeping stocks with A or A+ rating (top ones), although A-, B+, B and B- are Buys as well.
From thestreet.com:
A (Excellent) - The stock has an excellent track record for maximizing performance while minimizing risk, thus delivering the best possible combination of total return on investment and reduced volatility. It has made the most of the recent economic environment to maximize risk-adjusted returns compared to other stocks. While past performance is just an indication -- not a guarantee -- we believe this fund is among the most likely to deliver superior performance relative to risk in the future as well.
And about the methodology (source: https://www.thestreet.com/ratings/reports/detail/T.html):
TheStreet Ratings' stock model projects a stock's total return potential over a 12-month period including both price appreciation and dividends. Our Buy, Hold or Sell ratings designate how we expect these stocks to perform against a general benchmark of the equities market and interest rates. While our model is quantitative, it utilizes both subjective and objective elements. For instance, subjective elements include expected equities market returns, future interest rates, implied industry outlook and forecasted company earnings. Objective elements include volatility of past operating revenues, financial strength, and company cash flows.
2. Yahoo Finance recommendation and target price
It is required that the Yahoo Finance stock recommendation is at least mixed Buy/Hold from experts. Additionally, the predicted target price (average, from experts) should be at least 5% higher than the current one.
3. MarketBeat recommendation
Similar to Yahoo Finance, it is required that the MarketBeat stock recommendation is at least mixed Buy/Hold.
4. Piotroski F-Score
The Piotroski score is a number between 0-9 that reflects nine criteria used to determine the strength of a company's financial situation, including profitability, leverage or operating efficiency. Zero is the worst value and nine is the best. As we can read in Piotroski’s paper from 2000:
In addition, an investment strategy that buys expected winners and shorts expected losers generates a 23% annual return between 1976 and 1996, and the strategy appears to be robust across time and to controls for alternative investment strategies.
It is required that the score is 4 or higher. The values were retrieved from https://www.gurufocus.com.
5. Moody's Daily Credit Risk
Moody’s Daily Credit Risk Score is a 1-10 score, which provides a forward-looking, one-year measure of credit risk. It is updated daily and takes into account day-to-day market movements compared to a company’s liabilities.
The value is retrieved from https://markets.businessinsider.com and is expected to be in the range of 1-6.
6. InvestorsObserver Overall Score
The rank has a value in between 0 and 100. It takes into account both technical analysis and fundamental stock data. An Overall Rank of N means that a given company is rated above N% of stocks, therefore the higher the number, the better. My requirement is that the company has InvestorsObserver Overall score of at least 50.
More detailed explanation from https://www.investorsobserver.com/learning-centewhat-the-scores-mean/what-does-the-overall-score-mean:
The Overall Score combines our two technical scores (Short Term and Long Term) with our Fundamental Score into one metric. This makes our overall score a great place to start when evaluating stocks, regardless of your investing style.
A low score doesn’t necessarily mean a stock is likely to go down, just that our system doesn’t think there’s much of a bullish case for it.

Please note that the company profile data (short description) was taken from https://www.tradingview.com (sometimes I shortened it) and dividend data was retrieved from MarketBeat.
I hope you enjoyed the reading. What do you think about this stock selection and the strategy? Feel free to leave a comment below.
Michael

Disclosures:
submitted by investing-scientist2 to investing [link] [comments]


2020.09.29 20:33 SpecialistAbrocoma When conservatives talk about the 50% of the country that doesn't pay taxes, they're talking about Donald Trump.

Over the past 10 years the trope that "nearly 50% of Americans pay no taxes" has been strewn all over the internet, usually as an attack on low-income families that the right wants to paint as "welfare queens". 10 years ago when the tax policy center shared the statistic, four years ago when they were trying to use it in the last election, and last year. Even Rand Paul jumped on the wagon of spreading this poor take.
Most reasonable people understand that the 50% that doesn't pay income taxes are very young, low-income earners (just starting out) or the elderly (retired and on Social Security) or low-income families with children (who earn and pay, but not more than the credits they receive), and still pay a lot of other taxes. Further, the vast majority of those that won't pay income taxes in a given year will pay taxes as their situation improves. They're simply in a temporary, low-income spot.
But not good 'ol savior of the right, Donald Trump. In 11 of the last 18 years, he's found ways to avoid any income taxes. And we can assume this has been true for his entire life; after all he thinks it makes him smart and he certainly has never NOT had the money to pay an army of crooked accountants.
The man that wants YOU to pay more for the military, contributed $50 in 2016 and 2017 to the military via income taxes. Most of you likely contributed more.
It's absolutely laughable that a man who continually tells us we need to spend more is actively looking for every way to contribute less.
Trump is a welfare queen. He gets far more benefit from the US than the US gets from him.
The bottom 71.65 million taxpayers paid $670 per taxpayer in income taxes. Trump paid $750. next 49% paid $13,330 per taxpayer. top 1% paid $429,867 per taxpayer.
The bottom 50% contributed $50 per taxpayer to the military. Trump contributed $58 to the military. Next 49% contributed $1,000 per taxpayer to the military. Top 1% contributed $32,240 per taxpayer to the military.
 

Links and math

In 2017, Trump paid $750 in income taxes.
Americans earned $11 trillion in 2017 and paid $1.6 trillion in taxes. 21% of income was earned by 1%, so $2.31 trillion. 99% earned $8.69 trillion.
In order to pay nothing, you earn nothing. So Trump did not contribute meaningfully to the $11 trillion.
1% paid 38.5% of $1.6 trillion in taxes paid, so they paid $616 billion. 99% paid $984 billion. top 50% of earners paid 97% of taxes or $1.552 billion. top 1% paid $616 billion, so 49% paid $936 billion. bottom 50% paid 3%, so $48 billion.
143.3 million taxpayers. 1% is 1.433 million taxpayers. next 49% is 70.217 million taxpayers. bottom 50% is 71.65 million taxpayers.
bottom 71.65 million taxpayers paid $670 per taxpayer in income taxes. Trump paid $750. next 49% paid $13,330 per taxpayer. top 1% paid $429,867 per taxpayer.

 

 
50% of the federal budget comes from income taxes. 15% of the federal budget is spent on military. (1, 2, 3) Therefore, 7.5% of income taxes go to the military.
If Trump paid $750 in income taxes, then he contributed $58 to the military.
The bottom 50% contributed $50 to the military. Trump contributed $58 to the military. Next 49% contributed $1,000 to the military. Top 1% contributed $32,240 to the military.
submitted by SpecialistAbrocoma to PoliticalOpinions [link] [comments]


2020.09.29 18:49 RobYaLunch Billboard Chart Discussion - Week Of October 03, 2020

Billboard Hot 100 chart
Position Title Artist ▲/▼ Last week Weeks Charting Peak
1 Dynamite BTS ▲+1 2 5 1
2 WAP Cardi B Featuring Megan Thee Stallion ▼-1 1 7 1
3 Holy Justin Bieber Featuring Chance The Rapper ▲+98 [FRESH] 1 3
4 Laugh Now Cry Later Drake Featuring Lil Durk ▼-1 3 6 2
5 Mood 24kGoldn Featuring iann dior ▲+1 6 7 5
6 Rockstar DaBaby Featuring Roddy Ricch ▼-2 4 23 1
7 Blinding Lights The Weeknd ▼-2 5 43 1
8 Watermelon Sugar Harry Styles ▼-1 7 27 1
9 Savage Love (Laxed - Siren Beat) Jawsh 685 x Jason Derulo ▼-1 8 15 7
10 I Hope Gabby Barrett Featuring Charlie Puth ▲+1 11 39 10
11 Before You Go Lewis Capaldi ▼-2 9 34 9
12 Whats Poppin Jack Harlow Featuring DaBaby, Tory Lanez & Lil Wayne ▼-2 10 33 2
13 Go Crazy Chris Brown & Young Thug - 13 20 9
14 Popstar DJ Khaled Featuring Drake ▼-2 12 10 3
15 For The Night Pop Smoke Featuring Lil Baby & DaBaby - 15 12 6
16 Lemonade Internet Money & Gunna Featuring Don Toliver & NAV ▲+6 22 6 16
17 Circles Post Malone ▼-1 16 56 1
18 Roses SAINt JHN ▼-4 14 27 4
19 Come & Go Juice WRLD x Marshmello ▼-2 17 11 2
20 Mood Swings Pop Smoke Featuring Lil Tjay ▲+6 26 12 17
21 Got What I Got Jason Aldean - 21 17 21
22 One Of Them Girls Lee Brice ▼-3 19 17 19
23 Adore You Harry Styles ▼-5 18 42 6
24 Said Sum Moneybagg Yo ▲+36 60 12 24
25 Break My Heart Dua Lipa ▼-5 20 26 13
26 Lovin' On You Luke Combs ▼-3 23 13 23
27 Be Like That Kane Brown With Swae Lee & Khalid ▼-2 25 11 22
28 Tap In Saweetie ▼-4 24 11 20
29 Cool Again Kane Brown ▲+2 31 17 29
30 The Woo Pop Smoke Featuring 50 Cent & Roddy Ricch ▼-3 27 12 11
31 If The World Was Ending JP Saxe Featuring Julia Michaels ▼-1 30 26 27
32 Don't Start Now Dua Lipa ▼-4 28 47 2
33 Bang! AJR ▲+8 41 12 33
34 More Than My Hometown Morgan Wallen ▲+5 39 15 34
35 Rags2Riches Rod Wave Featuring ATR Son Son ▼-3 32 13 12
36 Life Is Good Future Featuring Drake ▼-3 33 37 2
37 ily surf mesa Featuring Emilee ▲+12 49 18 37
38 Kings & Queens Ava Max ▲+19 57 7 38
39 Midnight Sky Miley Cyrus ▼-5 34 6 14
40 Chasin' You Morgan Wallen ▲+3 43 35 16
41 Rain On Me Lady Gaga & Ariana Grande ▼-4 37 18 1
42 I Should Probably Go To Bed Dan + Shay ▲+3 45 8 42
43 Some Girls Jameson Rodgers ▲+19 62 7 43
44 Die From A Broken Heart Maddie & Tae ▼-6 38 24 22
45 Wishing Well Juice WRLD ▼-3 42 11 5
46 We Paid Lil Baby & 42 Dugg - 46 21 10
47 Say So Doja Cat Featuring Nicki Minaj ▲+1 48 38 1
48 Savage Megan Thee Stallion Featuring Beyonce ▼-8 40 28 1
49 Cardigan Taylor Swift ▲+3 52 9 1
50 Blueberry Faygo Lil Mosey ▼-3 47 33 8
51 Diamonds Sam Smith ▲+50 [FRESH] 1 51
52 One Beer HARDY Featuring Lauren Alaina & Devin Dawson ▲+4 56 16 52
53 Breaking Me Topic & A7S ▲+2 55 9 53
54 Heather Conan Gray ▼-3 51 6 46
55 Hawai Maluma ▲+3 58 5 55
56 What You Know Bout Love Pop Smoke ▲+27 83 3 52
57 Happy Anywhere Blake Shelton Featuring Gwen Stefani ▲+9 66 9 56
58 My Ex's Best Friend Machine Gun Kelly X blackbear ▲+12 70 6 58
59 7 Summers Morgan Wallen ▲+5 64 6 6
60 24 Money Man Featuring Lil Baby ▲+8 68 6 60
61 Pretty Heart Parker McCollum ▲+12 73 11 61
62 One Too Many Keith Urban Duet With P!nk ▲+39 [FRESH] 1 62
63 You Broke Me First. Tate McRae ▲+6 69 5 63
64 Like That Doja Cat Featuring Gucci Mane ▼-10 54 17 50
65 Greece DJ Khaled Featuring Drake ▲+9 74 10 8
66 Ice Cream BLACKPINK X Selena Gomez ▼-5 61 4 13
67 I Called Mama Tim McGraw ▲+11 78 8 61
68 Girls In The Hood Megan Thee Stallion ▼-15 53 13 28
69 The Bigger Picture Lil Baby ▲+2 71 15 3
70 Without You Luke Combs Featuring Amanda Shires ▲+31 [FRESH] 1 70
71 Un Dia (One Day) J Balvin, Dua Lipa, Bad Bunny & Tainy ▲+9 80 9 63
72 Kacey Talk YoungBoy Never Broke Again ▼-22 50 6 50
73 Starting Over Chris Stapleton ▲+16 89 4 57
74 Martin & Gina Polo G ▲+10 84 8 61
75 OK Not To Be OK Marshmello & Demi Lovato ▼-39 36 2 36
76 Relacion Sech, Daddy Yankee & J Balvin Featuring ROSALIA & Farruko ▼-1 75 3 64
77 Love You Like I Used To Russell Dickerson ▲+10 87 3 77
78 Smile Juice WRLD & The Weeknd ▲+1 79 7 8
79 Ain't Always The Cowboy Jon Pardi ▲+14 93 4 79
80 Dolly Lil Tecca Featuring Lil Uzi Vert ▲+21 [FRESH] 1 80
81 Hit Different SZA Featuring Ty Dolla $ign ▼-4 77 3 29
82 Nobody's Love Maroon 5 ▼-19 63 9 41
83 Everywhere But On Matt Stell ▲+11 94 3 83
84 Caramelo Ozuna x Karol G x Myke Towers ▲+1 85 6 76
85 Do It Chloe X Halle ▲+1 86 6 63
86 Over Now Calvin Harris X The Weeknd ▼-4 82 4 38
87 Dollaz On My Head Gunna Featuring Young Thug ▲+5 92 16 38
88 You Got It VEDO ▲+7 95 2 88
89 My Window YoungBoy Never Broke Again Featuring Lil Wayne ▼-54 35 2 35
90 When You Down Lil Tecca Featuring Polo G & Lil Durk ▲+11 [FRESH] 1 90
91 Me Gusta Anitta Featuring Cardi B & Myke Towers ▲+10 [FRESH] 1 91
92 Wet. (She Got That...) YFN Lucci ▲+9 [FRESH] 1 92
93 Whole Lotta Choppas Sada Baby ▲+8 [FRESH] 1 93
94 Lonely If You Are Chase Rice ▼-3 91 6 91
95 Blind DaBaby Featuring Young Thug ▲+6 [FRESH] 1 95
96 3 Headed Goat Lil Durk Featuring Lil Baby & Polo G ▲+1 97 13 43
97 Drug Addiction YoungBoy Never Broke Again ▼-53 44 2 44
98 La Jeepeta Nio Garcia x Anuel AA x Myke Towers x Brray x Juanka ▲+1 99 7 93
99 B.S. Jhene Aiko Featuring H.E.R. ▲+2 [FRESH] 8 24
100 Wolves Big Sean Featuring Post Malone ▲+1 [FRESH] 2 65
Billboard Global 200 chart (most popular songs globally)
Position Title Artist ▲/▼ Last week Weeks Charting Peak
1 Dynamite BTS ▲+1 2 3 1
2 WAP Cardi B Featuring Megan Thee Stallion ▼-1 1 3 1
3 Holy Justin Bieber Featuring Chance The Rapper ▲+98 [FRESH] 1 3
4 Mood 24kGoldn Featuring iann dior ▼-1 3 3 3
5 Hawai Maluma ▼-1 4 3 4
6 Lemonade Internet Money & Gunna Featuring Don Toliver & NAV ▲+5 11 3 6
7 Blinding Lights The Weeknd - 7 3 7
8 Laugh Now Cry Later Drake Featuring Lil Durk ▼-3 5 3 5
9 Savage Love (Laxed - Siren Beat) Jawsh 685 x Jason Derulo ▼-3 6 3 6
10 For The Night Pop Smoke Featuring Lil Baby & DaBaby - 10 3 10
Billboard 200 chart
Position Title Artist Sales Change Last week Weeks Charting
1 Folklore Taylor Swift 85,540 (56,674 pure) +89% 4 9
2 Shoot For The Stars Aim For The Moon Pop Smoke 78,703 (1,136 pure) +5% 2 12
3 Top YoungBoy Never Broke Again 62,929 (9,394 pure) -50% 1 2
4 Alicia Alicia Keys 59,218 (48,607 pure) -- [FRESH] 1
5 Legends Never Die Juice WRLD 49,264 (375 pure) -9% 3 11
6 Code Red Moneybagg Yo & Blac Youngsta 37,408 (1,532 pure) -- [FRESH] 1
7 The Speed Of Now, Part 1 Keith Urban err err [FRESH] 1
8 Hamilton: An American Musical Original Broadway Cast err err 5 261
9 My Turn Lil Baby 36,247 (138 pure) -11% 6 30
10 Virgo World Lil Tecca 35,379 (3,633 pure) -- [FRESH] 1
Frequently Asked Questions:
Q: Why is X artist higher than Y artist on the 200 chart, even though X artist sold less?
A: This is because of a discrepancy between Billboard's ranking and the ranking from the website that the sales data is scraped from
Q: Where do you get the sales data from?
A: https://hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming
Q: What does "err" mean on the 200 chart?
A: If you are seeing "err", that means that the bot I use to gather chart data couldn't identify sales data for a particular album because of a difference in album naming between Billboard and HitsDailyDouble
submitted by RobYaLunch to hiphopheads [link] [comments]


2020.09.29 18:39 swati_1510 Razor Blade Market Overview, Industry Top Manufactures, Size, Growth 2020-2027

Industry Overview of the Razor Blade Market 2020
The research report titled Global Razor Blade Market is an all-inclusive document containing crucial data pertaining to sales and revenue of the Razor Blade industry. The evaluations are done on the basis of the analysis of leading market segments such as types, applications, regions, technological advancements, and dominant players of the global Razor Blade industry. The report provides historical data (2017-2018) of the industry and provides valuable forecast information for the period of 2020-2027. The report is formulated with the analysis of current and emerging trends based on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has changed the dynamics of the market and has drastically shaken up the economic scenario of the world. The report covers an impact analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic and offers a futuristic outlook of a post COVID scenario. It also covers trends, demands, and growth rates impacted by the ongoing crisis.
To read more about the report @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/global-north-america-europe-and-asia-pacific-south-america-middle-east-and-africa-razor-blade-market-2017-forecast-to-2022
The forecast estimation states the global Razor Blade market is expected to dominate the economic sphere of the world with significant growth in the coming years. The growth is boosted by a change in demand patterns, rapidly developing infrastructure, technological advancements, and product advancements. The current and emerging trends are expected to shape up the industry and help in gaining a strong foothold in the global market to contribute to the revenue generation.
The Global Razor Blade market is further analyzed on the basis of key companies operating in the business sphere and major geographical regions where the market has a substantial size and growth rate.
Prominent Players:
Gillette(P&G)
Edgewell Personal Care
BIC
Laser Razor Blades
Lord
DORCO
Supermax
Harry's (Feintechnik)
FEATHER
Benxi Jincheng
Kaili Razor
Ningbo Jiali
Liyu Razor
Shanghai Cloud
Yingjili
Zonal Partition of the Market: North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East & Africa.
The report covers extensive analysis of market segments that are anticipated to lead by the end of the forecast period (2020-2027). The report puts a special emphasis on the upstream raw materials, downstream buyers, industrial chain analysis, technological and product advancements, and production and manufacturing capacities of the Razor Blade market. Moreover, the report provides an in-depth analysis of the core segments of the market by analysis of the applications, types, consumption patterns, market drivers and restraints, and challenges to be faced in the market.
The research study focuses on the emerging development patterns and manufacturing processes anticipated to boost the growth of the market. It also includes extensive profiles of prominent contenders of the industry and provides a complete analysis inclusive of their market share, market size, production capacity, sales and distribution network, import/export activity, and product portfolios.
Major objectives of the Global Razor Blade Report:
· Analysis and forecast estimation of the Global Razor Blade Market based on the market segmentation into types, applications, and regions
· Analysis of micro and macroeconomic factors affecting the global Razor Blade market
· Valuable insight into the major drivers, limitations, opportunities, and challenges faced by the global Razor Blade market and its players
· In-depth analysis of the prominent contenders along with their business strategies and expansion plans
· Strategic recommendations to the established companies as well as new entrants to assist in the formulation of investment plans
· Comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape of the Razor Blade industry
To summarize, the report provides a better understanding to the reader about the Razor Blade industry by offering a detailed explanation of the competitive landscape, industry environment, market projections, growth driving and restraining factors, limitations, entry barriers, and opportunities. The report also covers the regulatory framework, investment opportunities, and other growth driving factors. The report allows the reader to gather insightful information about each segment of the market and provides a historical, present, and prospective outlook of the market.
Get a Free Sample PDF Report to understand our report before you purchase: https://www.reportsanddata.com/sample-enquiry-form/72
Thank you for reading our report. To know more about the report or for any queries regarding customization, please connect with us. Our team will provide excellent assistance and make sure the report is tailored to meet your requirements.
submitted by swati_1510 to u/swati_1510 [link] [comments]


2020.09.29 16:31 Agent_Phantom [Offer] Data Analysis, Bots, Web Scrapers & Automation Software

Hello!
I'm offering my programming services to develop affordable solutions to common tasks such as:
All the solutions are coded in Python 3 in compliance with best practices and PEP 8.
The scripts are cross platform compatible, you can also schedule them to run automatically using crontab on a Linux VPS, Raspberry PI or GitHub Actions and on Windows using Task Scheduler.
Prices are affordable and payments can be made via PayPal.
Delivery time is often 1-2 business days depending on project difficulty.

Examples

Data Analysis Services

I am also offering Data Analysis services, which cover the process of collecting your dataset and your requirements to cleaning, modeling, exploring and communicating the results.
You will receive a report in a PDF file which will contain graphs, plots, tables and insights.
It is preferred that your dataset is in csv, xls or xlsx format. SQL and NoSQL are also acceptable.
If needed I will sign your NDA at no additional cost.
Delivery time and costs depend on your requirements, this will be handled in number of 'questions'. Each 'question' will be answered with the most appropiate graph, a table and a text explanation.
Some examples of 'questions' are:

Examples

Approximate Costs of Most Requested Tasks

Task Description Approximate Cost (USD) Approximate Delivery Time
Simple Web Scraper A web scraper for websites that are well structured or for web APIs. $20.00 - $40.00 < 24 hours
Complex Web Scraper A web scraper for websites that are not well structured and require a complex spider or managing user sessions. Also for web scrapers that require to rotate proxies and user agents. Starts at $40.00 < 24 hours
Selenium Web ScrapeAutomation A web scraper developed using Selenium WebDriver. Required for the most complex websites, it can include support for proxy rotation. Starts at $100.00 24 - 48 hours
Simple Reddit/TwitteDiscord (webhook) bot A bot that monitors subreddits/users/hashtags/websites and performs a predefined action. $30.00 - $50.00 < 24 hours
Complex Reddit/Discord bot A bot that takes commands and performs actions with the given parameters. The number of commands and their complexity increases the cost. Starts at $100.00 24 - 72 hours
Data Transformation Tool A script that performs transformation tasks on your datasets and raw text files such as extracting, cleaning, renaming, concatenating, removing duplicates, etc. $20.00 - $50.00 < 24 hours
Data Analysis (5 questions) A report in PDF which will contain graphs, plots, tables and insights from your dataset. $100.00 48 - 72 hours
Costs are influenced by the complexity of the given task and the quality of the target website. Feel free to ask any questions here or via PM.
Website GitHub
submitted by Agent_Phantom to slavelabour [link] [comments]


01 ATR 72-500 Aircraft General - YouTube 72. Github Finder [Part 2] - Fetching Profile Data - YouTube Business Intelligence vs. Excel - YouTube Hilti TE 72 - YouTube 72 dana ceo film Oktobar film - YouTube Data Entry Work 2020  Data Entry jobs  Data entry jobs ... Retrieve the data (PL 72) - YouTube Söz  72.Bölüm - YouTube Régime représentatif, mais de quoi ? - #DATAGUEULE 72 ... 72-EDO algorithmic IDM in Pure Data - YouTube

72 Alibaba Cloud Data Servers “Stealing” Users Data ...

  1. 01 ATR 72-500 Aircraft General - YouTube
  2. 72. Github Finder [Part 2] - Fetching Profile Data - YouTube
  3. Business Intelligence vs. Excel - YouTube
  4. Hilti TE 72 - YouTube
  5. 72 dana ceo film Oktobar film - YouTube
  6. Data Entry Work 2020 Data Entry jobs Data entry jobs ...
  7. Retrieve the data (PL 72) - YouTube
  8. Söz 72.Bölüm - YouTube
  9. Régime représentatif, mais de quoi ? - #DATAGUEULE 72 ...
  10. 72-EDO algorithmic IDM in Pure Data - YouTube

https://store.playstation.com/#!/tid=CUSA00572_00 https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.de%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F293100446238 Aircraft General CBT Data Entry Work 2020 Data Entry jobs Data entry jobs from home MegaTypers #megatypers #earn ... Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Dans un gouvernement représentatif, l’idéal, c’est que les élus représentent les citoyens. Or aujourd’hui, on en est encore loin. Forte abstention, faible re... 72-EDO scale network (like my 53-EDO video; I'm omitting the visualization for this one). All PD with no plugins or samples. The reverb algorithm is based on... Excel is undeniably the single most popular data analytics tool in the world. But is Excel always the right tool for the job? In this video, we explore proce... Karargâha bombalı saldırı yapmak üzere olan Karabatak’ı(Eren Vurdem) karşısında gören Tim, büyük bir şok yaşar. Tim ve Nazlı(İlayda Ildır), Karabatak’a aslın... Label and copyright: Oktobar Film Zabranjeno svako kopiranje video i/ili audio snimaka i postavljanje na druge kanale!